These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11206166)

  • 1. Recognition of time-distorted sentences by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):379-84. PubMed ID: 11206166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal-hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1166-72. PubMed ID: 11303930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Zeng FG; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-compression thresholds for Mandarin sentences in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Meng Q; Wang X; Cai Y; Kong F; Buck AN; Yu G; Zheng N; Schnupp JWH
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 374():58-68. PubMed ID: 30732921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.
    Fu QJ; Nogaki G
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15735937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
    Fu QJ; Shannon RV; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Cruz RJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(3):169-84. PubMed ID: 15724088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson PB; Jin SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Henry BA; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 May; 113(5):2861-73. PubMed ID: 12765402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech recognition by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners as a function of intensity resolution.
    Loizou PC; Dorman M; Poroy O; Spahr T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2377-87. PubMed ID: 11108378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spectral-Temporal Trade-Off in Vocoded Sentence Recognition: Effects of Age, Hearing Thresholds, and Working Memory.
    Shader MJ; Yancey CM; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1226-1235. PubMed ID: 32032222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects.
    Benoit C; Carlson RJ; King MC; Horn DL; Rubinstein JT
    Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 439():108898. PubMed ID: 37890241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Ji C; Galvin JJ; Xu A; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 23238527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of aging on speech perception in noise: comparison between normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Jin SH; Liu C; Sladen DP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(7):656-65. PubMed ID: 25365368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.
    Henry BA; Turner CW; Behrens A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1111-21. PubMed ID: 16158665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.