These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11206201)

  • 1. The ties that bind what is known to the recall of what is new.
    Nelson DL; Zhang N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Dec; 7(4):604-17. PubMed ID: 11206201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One step is not enough: making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.
    Nelson DL; Bennett DJ; Leibert TW
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):785-96. PubMed ID: 9421564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities.
    Nelson DL; Dyrdal GM; Goodmon LB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):711-9. PubMed ID: 16447386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.
    Nelson DL; Fisher SL; Akirmak U
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1892-904. PubMed ID: 18265606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hypermnesia: the role of multiple retrieval cues.
    Otani H; Widner RL; Whiteman HL; St Louis JP
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Sep; 27(5):928-34. PubMed ID: 10540821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
    Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are test-expectancy effects better explained by changes in encoding strategies or differential test experience?
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 32940510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primacy and recency in primed free association and associative cued recall.
    Brooks BM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Sep; 6(3):479-85. PubMed ID: 12198787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.
    Nelson DL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(4):503-17. PubMed ID: 4096333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age effects in cued recall: sources from implicit and explicit memory.
    McEvoy CL; Holley PE; Nelson DL
    Psychol Aging; 1995 Sep; 10(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 8527053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incongruous item generation effects: a multiple-cue perspective.
    Soraci SA; Franks JJ; Bransford JD; Chechile RA; Belli RF; Carr M; Carlin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 8138789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transfer of Test-Enhanced Learning.
    DiMarco D; Marmurek H
    Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):119-131. PubMed ID: 35975624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recall and response time norms for English-Swahili word pairs and facts about Kenya.
    Bangert AS; Heydarian NM
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):124-171. PubMed ID: 26822669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ties that bind what is known to the recognition of what is new.
    Nelson DL; Zhang N; McKinney VM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1147-59. PubMed ID: 11550743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue set size effects: sampling activated associates or cross-target interference?
    Nelson DL; Schreiber TA; Xu J
    Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 10355236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.