These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11206284)
1. How sensitive is hand transport to illusory context effects? Fischer MH Exp Brain Res; 2001 Jan; 136(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 11206284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion. Króliczak G; Heard P; Goodale MA; Gregory RL Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16516866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of an orientation illusion on motor performance and motor imagery. Glover S; Dixon P; Castiello U; Rushworth MF Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 166(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16082537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age-related differences in a delayed pointing of a Müller-Lyer illusion. Rival C; Olivier I; Ceyte H; Ferrel C Exp Brain Res; 2003 Dec; 153(3):378-81. PubMed ID: 14513301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual information and rubber hand embodiment differentially affect reach-to-grasp actions. Heed T; Gründler M; Rinkleib J; Rudzik FH; Collins T; Cooke E; O'Regan JK Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):263-71. PubMed ID: 21788001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual illusions modify object size estimates for prospective action judgements. Geers L; Pesenti M; Andres M Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():211-221. PubMed ID: 29883576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Ebbinghaus illusion affects on-line movement control. Handlovsky I; Hansen S; Lee TD; Elliott D Neurosci Lett; 2004 Aug; 366(3):308-11. PubMed ID: 15288440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of visual illusions on grasp position. Ellis RR; Flanagan JR; Lederman SJ Exp Brain Res; 1999 Mar; 125(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 10204763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Müller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Meegan DV; Glazebrook CM; Dhillon VP; Tremblay L; Welsh TN; Elliott D Exp Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 155(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 15064883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion. Heath M; Rival C; Binsted G Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 15278330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of response uncertainty on illusory biases of perception and action. Keetch KM; Glazebrook CM; Lyons J; Lam MY; Weeks DJ; Elliott D Neurosci Lett; 2006 Oct; 406(1-2):117-21. PubMed ID: 16901634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias? Glazebrook CM; Dhillon VP; Keetch KM; Lyons J; Amazeen E; Weeks DJ; Elliott D Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 15300347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control. Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of illusory size on force production when grasping objects. Westwood DA; Dubrowski A; Carnahan H; Roy EA Exp Brain Res; 2000 Dec; 135(4):535-43. PubMed ID: 11156317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation. Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):920-50. PubMed ID: 19378412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of real and illusory target perturbations on manual aiming. Grierson LE; Elliott D Exp Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 197(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 19565225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined visual illusion effects on the perceived index of difficulty and movement outcomes in discrete and continuous fitts' tapping. Alphonsa S; Dai B; Benham-Deal T; Zhu Q Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 25535018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The type of visual information mediates eye and hand movement bias when aiming to a Müller-Lyer illusion. Lavrysen A; Helsen WF; Elliott D; Buekers MJ; Feys P; Heremans E Exp Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 174(3):544-54. PubMed ID: 16645876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vision for spatial perception and vision for action: a dissociation between the left-right and near-far dimensions. Coello Y; Richaud S; Magne P; Rossetti Y Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(5):622-33. PubMed ID: 12559155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action. Haffenden AM; Goodale MA Vision Res; 2000; 40(10-12):1597-607. PubMed ID: 10788660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]