These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11206370)

  • 1. A novel method for building regression tree models for QSAR based on artificial ant colony systems.
    Izrailev S; Agrafiotis D
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2001; 41(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 11206370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Building optimal regression tree by ant colony system-genetic algorithm: application to modeling of melting points.
    Hemmateenejad B; Shamsipur M; Zare-Shahabadi V; Akhond M
    Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Oct; 704(1-2):57-62. PubMed ID: 21907021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variable selection for QSAR by artificial ant colony systems.
    Izrailev S; Agrafiotis DK
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002; 13(3-4):417-23. PubMed ID: 12184383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An efficient variable selection method based on the use of external memory in ant colony optimization. Application to QSAR/QSPR studies.
    Shamsipur M; Zare-Shahabadi V; Hemmateenejad B; Akhond M
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Jul; 646(1-2):39-46. PubMed ID: 19523554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of lambda(max) of 1,4-naphthoquinone derivatives using ant colony optimization.
    Atabati M; Zarei K; Mohsennia M
    Anal Chim Acta; 2010 Mar; 663(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 20172089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current approaches for choosing feature selection and learning algorithms in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR).
    Khan PM; Roy K
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2018 Dec; 13(12):1075-1089. PubMed ID: 30372648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feature selection and classification employing hybrid ant colony optimization/random forest methodology.
    Patil D; Raj R; Shingade P; Kulkarni B; Jayaraman VK
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2009 Jun; 12(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 19519330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new and efficient variable selection algorithm based on ant colony optimization. Applications to near infrared spectroscopy/partial least-squares analysis.
    Allegrini F; Olivieri AC
    Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Aug; 699(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 21704753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contemporary QSAR classifiers compared.
    Bruce CL; Melville JL; Pickett SD; Hirst JD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 17238267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiobjective optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationships: deriving accurate and interpretable QSARs.
    Nicolotti O; Gillet VJ; Fleming PJ; Green DV
    J Med Chem; 2002 Nov; 45(23):5069-80. PubMed ID: 12408718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pre-processing feature selection for improved C&RT models for oral absorption.
    Newby D; Freitas AA; Ghafourian T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2730-42. PubMed ID: 24050619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond the scope of Free-Wilson analysis: building interpretable QSAR models with machine learning algorithms.
    Chen H; Carlsson L; Eriksson M; Varkonyi P; Norinder U; Nilsson I
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1324-36. PubMed ID: 23789733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for quantifying and visualizing the diversity of QSAR models.
    Izrailev S; Agrafiotis DK
    J Mol Graph Model; 2004 Mar; 22(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 15177079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationships and classification models for anticonvulsant activity of hydantoin analogues.
    Sutherland JJ; Weaver DF
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(3):1028-36. PubMed ID: 12767162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A binary ant colony optimization classifier for molecular activities.
    Hammann F; Suenderhauf C; Huwyler J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2690-6. PubMed ID: 21854036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stochastic versus stepwise strategies for quantitative structure-activity relationship generation--how much effort may the mining for successful QSAR models take?
    Horvath D; Bonachera F; Solov'ev V; Gaudin C; Varnek A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):927-39. PubMed ID: 17480052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rank-based ant system method for non-linear QSPR analysis: QSPR studies of the solubility parameter.
    Bagheri M; Golbraikh A
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1-2):59-86. PubMed ID: 22040297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal Piecewise Linear Regression Algorithm for QSAR Modelling.
    Cardoso-Silva J; Papadatos G; Papageorgiou LG; Tsoka S
    Mol Inform; 2019 Mar; 38(3):e1800028. PubMed ID: 30251339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the dynamics of ant colony optimization.
    Merkle D; Middendorf M
    Evol Comput; 2002; 10(3):235-62. PubMed ID: 12227995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified ant colony optimization algorithm for variable selection in QSAR modeling: QSAR studies of cyclooxygenase inhibitors.
    Shen Q; Jiang JH; Tao JC; Shen GL; Yu RQ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1024-9. PubMed ID: 16045297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.