469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11206772)
1. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis in the mitral position: a 10-year follow up of St. Jude Medical and Biocor valves.
Demirag M; Kirali K; Omeroglu SN; Mansuroglu D; Akinci E; Ipek G; Berki T; Gürbüz A; Isik O; Yakut C
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11206772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-center outcome analysis of 1,161 patients with St. Jude medical and ATS open pivot mechanical heart valves.
Bernet FH; Baykut D; Grize L; Zerkowski HR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Mar; 16(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 17484464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term follow up of the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position.
Pomerantzeff PM; Brandão CM; Albuquerque JM; Stolf NA; Grinberg M; Oliveira SA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Nov; 15(6):763-6; discussion 766-7. PubMed ID: 17152783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén P; Bech-Hanssen O; Phipps B; Caidahl K
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long term results of mitral valve replacement with preservation of the posterior leaflet.
Katircioglu F; Yamak B; Battaloglu B; Saritas A; Kiziltepe U; Kural T; Tasdemir O; Bayazit K
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 May; 5(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 8793680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early and late risk of mitral valve replacement. A 12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and prosthetic disc mitral valves.
Cohn LH; Allred EN; Cohn LA; Austin JC; Sabik J; DiSesa VJ; Shemin RJ; Collins JJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Dec; 90(6):872-81. PubMed ID: 4068737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement.
Khan SS; Trento A; DeRobertis M; Kass RM; Sandhu M; Czer LS; Blanche C; Raissi S; Fontana GP; Cheng W; Chaux A; Matloff JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 5 1/2 year experience with the St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prosthesis. Early and late results of 737 valve replacements in 671 patients.
Baudet EM; Oca CC; Roques XF; Laborde MN; Hafez AS; Collot MA; Ghidoni IM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Jul; 90(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 3874324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomized comparison of CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses: ten-year follow-up.
Bryan AJ; Rogers CA; Bayliss K; Wild J; Angelini GD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 133(3):614-22. PubMed ID: 17320553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up.
Hammond GL; Geha AS; Kopf GS; Hashim SW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
Vrandecic M; Fantini FA; Filho BG; de O; da C; Vrandecic E
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 11843505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative clinical outcomes with St. Jude Medical, Medtronic Hall and CarboMedics mechanical heart valves.
Masters RG; Helou J; Pipe AL; Keon WJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 11380109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mitral valve replacement with St. Jude Medical prosthesis and low-dose anticoagulation in patients aged over 50 years.
Katircioglu SF; Yamak B; Ulus AT; Tasdemir O; Bayazit K
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul; 7(4):455-9. PubMed ID: 9697071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.
Davis EA; Greene PS; Cameron DE; Gott VI; Laschinger JC; Stuart RS; Sussman MS; Watkins L; Baumgartner WA
Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(9 Suppl):II121-5. PubMed ID: 8901731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decision-making in the choice of heart valve for replacement in patients aged 60-70 years: twenty-year follow up of the St. Jude Medical aortic valve prosthesis.
Emery RW; Arom KV; Kshettry VR; Kroshus TJ; Von R; Kersten TE; Lillehei TJ; Nicoloff DM; Erickson CA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11 Suppl 1():S37-44. PubMed ID: 11843519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term results with St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics prosthetic heart valves.
Chang BC; Lim SH; Kim DK; Seo JY; Cho SY; Shim WH; Chung N; Kim SS; Cho BK
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):185-194; discussion195. PubMed ID: 11297205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Choice of replacement valve in the elderly.
Kobayashi Y; Eishi K; Nagata S; Nakano K; Sasako Y; Kobayashi J; Kosakai Y; Miyatake K
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 9263873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
