248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11209647)
1. Tapping and resolving consumer concerns about health care.
Kinney ED
Am J Law Med; 2000; 26(4):335-99. PubMed ID: 11209647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Texas Health Care Liability Act: Texas is the first state to listen to the concerns of its health care consumers, but how much has it heard?
McCabe KM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 16(2):565-95. PubMed ID: 10970185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to appeal.
Meyer H
Hosp Health Netw; 1998 May; 72(9):22-6. PubMed ID: 9646732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Considerations in Medicare reform: the impact of Medicare preemption on state laws.
Jackonis MJ
Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(1):179-231, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15002184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Second thoughts: can managed care be ethical?
Weber DO
Healthc Forum J; 1997; 40(4):17, 20-5. PubMed ID: 10169558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Between the lines of the GOP bills.
Rovner J
Bus Health; 1998 Sep; 16(9):22. PubMed ID: 10185124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The people vs HMOs.
Howe RF
Time; 1999 Feb; 153(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 10345773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Countdown to patient protection.
Roslokken DW
Bus Health; 1999 Apr; 17(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 10351246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Managing the utilization of managed care (health care reform II).
Daigel GC
Manag Care Q; 1998; 6(4):47-51. PubMed ID: 10185778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The future of managed care: the debate continues.
Benjamin GC
Physician Exec; 1998; 24(3):67-9. PubMed ID: 10180980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External review. Consumer advocates, health plans, and policy makers weigh the merits of external review.
Meyer H
Healthplan; 1998; 39(4):44-51. PubMed ID: 10351323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Congress debates managed care reform.
Mullen P
Manag Care; 1998 Apr; 7(4):52, 55-8. PubMed ID: 10179356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A court muddies the water for HMO liability.
Guglielmo WJ
Med Econ; 1999 Jan; 76(1):41. PubMed ID: 10351080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ERISA preemption: will the elimination of the ERISA preemption clause help or harm America's ability to deal with its pending health care crisis?
Taylor DH
J Law Health; 1999-2000; 14(1):133-78. PubMed ID: 11187365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The evolving effect of ERISA on managed care liability.
Peterson CA
Hosp Top; 2001; 79(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 11558256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Emerging legal issues.
Marren JP
Manag Care Q; 1998; 6(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10181707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. ERISA. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10628447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Weaker ERISA? Telling pay from payola.
Greene J
Hosp Health Netw; 1998 Jun; 72(12):52, 54. PubMed ID: 9691966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Utilization review and managed health care liability.
Spector RA
South Med J; 2004 Mar; 97(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 15043337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unconstitutional or impossible: the irreconcilable gap between managed care and due process in Medicaid and Medicare.
Wright JL
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 17(1):135-80. PubMed ID: 11216337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
