BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11209836)

  • 1. Influence of measurement accuracy on the application of the 1991 NIOSH equation.
    Dempsey PG; Burdorf A; Fathallah FA; Sorock GS; Hashemi L
    Appl Ergon; 2001 Feb; 32(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 11209836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
    Dempsey PG
    Ergonomics; 2002 Oct; 45(12):817-28. PubMed ID: 12487684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variable Lifting Index (VLI): A New Method for Evaluating Variable Lifting Tasks.
    Waters T; Occhipinti E; Colombini D; Alvarez-Casado E; Fox R
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):695-711. PubMed ID: 26646300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of measurements for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
    Waters TR; Baron SL; Kemmlert K
    Appl Ergon; 1998 Dec; 29(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 9796788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of a 2D video-based lifting monitor.
    Wang X; Hu YH; Lu ML; Radwin RG
    Ergonomics; 2019 Aug; 62(8):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 31092146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between low back discomfort ratings and the NIOSH lifting index.
    Wang MJ; Garg A; Chang YC; Shih YC; Yeh WY; Lee CL
    Hum Factors; 1998 Sep; 40(3):509-15. PubMed ID: 9849108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the risk assessment capability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation by incorporating personal characteristics.
    Barim MS; Sesek RF; Capanoglu MF; Drinkaus P; Schall MC; Gallagher S; Davis GA
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():67-73. PubMed ID: 30487111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of measurements for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. Applied Ergonomics 29(6) 433-438.
    Burdorf A; van der Beek A
    Appl Ergon; 1999 Aug; 30(4):369-71. PubMed ID: 10416850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.
    Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Fine LJ
    Ergonomics; 1993 Jul; 36(7):749-76. PubMed ID: 8339717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical lifting energy consumption in work activities designed by means of the "revised NIOSH lifting equation".
    Ranavolo A; Varrecchia T; Rinaldi M; Silvetti A; Serrao M; Conforto S; Draicchio F
    Ind Health; 2017 Oct; 55(5):444-454. PubMed ID: 28781290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revised NIOSH equation for manual lifting: a method for job evaluation.
    Garg A
    AAOHN J; 1995 Apr; 43(4):211-6; quiz 217-8. PubMed ID: 7772206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When is it safe to manually lift a patient?
    Waters TR
    Am J Nurs; 2007 Aug; 107(8):53-8; quiz 59. PubMed ID: 17667392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Cumulative Lifting Index (CULI) for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: Quantifying Risk for Workers With Job Rotation.
    Garg A; Kapellusch JM
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 26896406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.
    Lu ML; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Davis KG
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):667-82. PubMed ID: 26822795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of manual lifting tasks: a qualitative alternative to the NIOSH work practices guide.
    Keyserling WM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 Mar; 50(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 2718910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting the load constant of the revised NIOSH lifting equation based on demographics.
    Ahmad S; Muzammil M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Sep; 29(3):1016-1024. PubMed ID: 35758150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of ACGIH lifting threshold limit values to validated low back disorder lifting assessment methods outcomes.
    Hafez K; Jorgensen MJ; Amick RZ
    Work; 2023; 76(3):1047-1060. PubMed ID: 37125603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of methods assessing the physical demands of manual lifting in scaffolding.
    van der Beek AJ; Erik Mathiassen S; Windhorst J; Burdorf A
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Mar; 36(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 15694076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New procedure for assessing sequential manual lifting jobs using the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
    Waters TR; Lu ML; Occhipinti E
    Ergonomics; 2007 Nov; 50(11):1761-70. PubMed ID: 17972201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and validity of self-reported assessment of exposure and outcome variables for manual lifting tasks: a preliminary investigation.
    Yeung SS; Genaidy AM; Karwowski W; Leung PC
    Appl Ergon; 2002 Sep; 33(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 12236655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.