These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11209836)

  • 21. Automation of workplace lifting hazard assessment for musculoskeletal injury prevention.
    Spector JT; Lieblich M; Bao S; McQuade K; Hughes M
    Ann Occup Environ Med; 2014; 26():15. PubMed ID: 24987523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the revised NIOSH lifting equation. A cross-sectional epidemiologic study.
    Waters TR; Baron SL; Piacitelli LA; Anderson VP; Skov T; Haring-Sweeney M; Wall DK; Fine LJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(4):386-94; discussion 395. PubMed ID: 10065524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting.
    Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
    Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2455-64. PubMed ID: 8586075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Physiological and psychophysical comparison between a lifting task with identical weight but different coupling factors.
    Adams KJ; DeBeliso M; Sevene-Adams PG; Berning JM; Miller T; Tollerud DJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Feb; 24(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 20072069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modification of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Lifting Equation to Determine the Individual Manual Lifting Risk in Malaysia's Manufacturing Industry.
    Dawad NA; Yasin SM; Darus A; Jamil AT; Nyi Naing N
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57747. PubMed ID: 38715993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of multi-task ergonomic assessment methods for risk of upper extremity and low back musculoskeletal disorders.
    Jorgensen MJ; Martinez A; Hakansson NA
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Sep; 119():104313. PubMed ID: 38749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comprehensive lifting model: beyond the NIOSH lifting equation.
    Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
    Ergonomics; 1997 Sep; 40(9):916-27. PubMed ID: 9306742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders.
    Marras WS; Fine LJ; Ferguson SA; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 9973881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evaluation of the NIOSH Lifting Equation: a psychophysical and biomechanical investigation.
    Elfeituri FE; Taboun SM
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 12067513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Four assessment tools of ergonomics interventions: case study at an electric utility's warehouse system.
    Marklin RW; Wilzbacher JR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 10635543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An evaluation of the NIOSH guidelines for manual lifting, with special reference to horizontal distance.
    Garg A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 Mar; 50(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 2718909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Epidemiological and biomechanical evaluation of airline baggage handling.
    Tafazzol A; Aref S; Mardani M; Haddad O; Parnianpour M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2016; 22(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 26654282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Variable Lifting Index for Manual-Lifting Risk Assessment: A Preliminary Validation Study.
    Battevi N; Pandolfi M; Cortinovis I
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):712-25. PubMed ID: 27037305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Methods for assessing the physical demands of manual lifting: a review and case study from warehousing.
    Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Baron S
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):871-81. PubMed ID: 9866167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of asymmetry on psychophysical lifting capacity for three lifting types.
    Han B; Stobbe TJ; Hobbs GR
    Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):364-79. PubMed ID: 15804846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Manual handling risks and controls in a soft drinks distribution centre.
    Wright EJ; Haslam RA
    Appl Ergon; 1999 Aug; 30(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 10416843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What is a demanding lifting job for manual handling workers in Hong Kong?
    Yeung SS; Genaidy AM; Deddens J; Leung PC
    Ergonomics; 2003 May; 46(6):574-97. PubMed ID: 12745689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Work-Related Risk Assessment According to the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: A Preliminary Study Using a Wearable Inertial Sensor and Machine Learning.
    Donisi L; Cesarelli G; Coccia A; Panigazzi M; Capodaglio EM; D'Addio G
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33917206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using a smart textile system for classifying occupational manual material handling tasks: evidence from lab-based simulations.
    Mokhlespour Esfahani MI; Nussbaum MA; Kong ZJ
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jun; 62(6):823-833. PubMed ID: 30716019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.