These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Aposematic colouration enhances memory formation in domestic chicks trained in a weak passive avoidance learning paradigm. Johnston AN; Burne TH Brain Res Bull; 2008 Jun; 76(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 18498948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey. Gamberale G; Tullberg BS Proc Biol Sci; 1996 Oct; 263(1375):1329-34. PubMed ID: 8914330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automimicry destabilizes aposematism: predator sample-and-reject behaviour may provide a solution. Gamberale-Stille G; Guilford T Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec; 271(1557):2621-5. PubMed ID: 15615689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals. Endler JA; Mappes J Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):532-47. PubMed ID: 15122501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness. Merilaita S; Ruxton GD J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 17157321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fruit or aposematic insect? Context-dependent colour preferences in domestic chicks. Gamberale-Stille G; Tullberg BS Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Dec; 268(1485):2525-9. PubMed ID: 11749705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights. Puurtinen M; Kaitala V Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical. Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Birds learn to avoid aposematic prey by using the appearance of host plants. McLellan CF; Scott-Samuel NE; Cuthill IC Curr Biol; 2021 Dec; 31(23):5364-5369.e4. PubMed ID: 34624210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation. Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence. Skelhorn J; Rowe C Biol Lett; 2006 Sep; 2(3):348-50. PubMed ID: 17148400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evolutionarily stable defence and signalling of that defence. Broom M; Speed MP; Ruxton GD J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 16529773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]