231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11210250)
1. Modeling capacity of ENDOflash files in simulated root canals.
Fariniuk LF; Baratto-Filho F; Guerisoli DM; Barbizam JV; Pécora JD; Sousa-Neto MD
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11210250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
Schäfer E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals.
Park H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 11402288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals.
Calberson FL; Deroose CA; Hommez GM; De Moor RJ
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):613-23. PubMed ID: 15317565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals with nickel-titanium and stainless-steel instruments.
Schäfer E; Lau R
J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):427-30. PubMed ID: 10530244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel-titanium files.
Sattapan B; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Endod; 2000 Mar; 26(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 11199710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals.
Madureira RG; Forner Navarro L; Llena MC; Costa M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):e136-44. PubMed ID: 19969482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic hypochlorite activation in simulated curved canals.
Al-Jadaa A; Paqué F; Attin T; Zehnder M
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1408-11. PubMed ID: 19801241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of a manual glide path on the preparation of curved root canals by using Mtwo rotary instruments.
Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
J Endod; 2009 May; 35(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 19410086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of nickel-titanium file distortion using electric and air-driven handpieces.
Bortnick KL; Steiman HR; Ruskin A
J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 11487167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
Ayar LR; Love RM
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the shaping ability of RaCe and FlexMaster rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals.
Merrett SJ; Bryant ST; Dummer PM
J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):960-2. PubMed ID: 16982273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
