These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11210250)

  • 21. Precurving of nickel-titanium files affects transportation in simulated canals.
    Svec TA; Wang MM
    J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 9487861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of three nickel-titanium rotary file techniques on infected root dentin reduction.
    Chuste-Guillot MP; Badet C; Peli JF; Perez F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 16876071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Study of the progressive changes in canal shape after using different instruments by hand in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Ding-ming H; Hong-xia L; Cheung GS; Lan Z; Hong T; Xue-dong Z
    J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):986-9. PubMed ID: 17878089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
    Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fracture of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a laboratory simulation assessment.
    Di Fiore PM; Genov KI; Komaroff E; Dasanayake AP; Lin L
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):502-9. PubMed ID: 16674746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Determination of root canal curvatures before and after canal preparation (part II): A method based on numeric calculus.
    Sonntag D; Stachniss-Carp S; Stachniss C; Stachniss V
    Aust Endod J; 2006 Apr; 32(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 16603041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cross-sectional analysis of root canals prepared with NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel reciprocating files.
    Grande NM; Plotino G; Butti A; Messina F; Pameijer CH; Somma F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jan; 103(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 17178505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of torque required to fracture three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments around curves of the same angle but of different radius when bound at the tip.
    Booth JR; Scheetz JP; Lemons JE; Eleazer PD
    J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12540222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals.
    Bahia MG; Buono VT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Aug; 100(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 16037784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9641148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance in reciprocating and rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Wan J; Rasimick BJ; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Aust Endod J; 2011 Dec; 37(3):122-7. PubMed ID: 22117719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the efficacy of manual and automated instrumentation of root canals.
    Schäfer E; Zapke K
    J Endod; 2000 Nov; 26(11):660-4. PubMed ID: 11469296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation.
    Tucker DM; Wenckus CS; Bentkover SK
    J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9594758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
    Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.