294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11210863)
1. A comparison of monopolar electrosurgery to a new multipolar electrosurgical system in a rat model.
Chinpairoj S; Feldman MD; Saunders JC; Thaler ER
Laryngoscope; 2001 Feb; 111(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 11210863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histologic evaluation of porcine skin incisions produced by CO2 laser, electrosurgery, and scalpel.
Arashiro DS; Rapley JW; Cobb CM; Killoy WJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Oct; 16(5):479-91. PubMed ID: 9084320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of wound-healing characteristics with feedback circuit electrosurgical generators in a porcine model.
Pollinger HS; Mostafa G; Harold KL; Austin CE; Kercher KW; Matthews BD
Am Surg; 2003 Dec; 69(12):1054-60. PubMed ID: 14700290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery using a newly designed multifunctional bipolar cutting and monopolar coagulating instrument.
Kanehira E; Raestrup H; Schurr MO; Wehrmann M; Manncke K; Buess GF
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1993 Apr; 1(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 8055297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of steel scalpel, ultrasonic scalpel, CO2 laser, and monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery on wound healing in guinea pig oral mucosa.
Sinha UK; Gallagher LA
Laryngoscope; 2003 Feb; 113(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 12567074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A preliminary study of healing of diode laser versus scalpel incisions in rat oral tissue: a comparison of clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical results.
D'Arcangelo C; Di Nardo Di Maio F; Prosperi GD; Conte E; Baldi M; Caputi S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jun; 103(6):764-73. PubMed ID: 17095269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of wound healing in rat skin following incision with a novel picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) and different surgical modalities.
Petersen H; Tavakoli F; Kruber S; Münscher A; Gliese A; Hansen NO; Uschold S; Eggert D; Robertson WD; Gosau T; Sehner S; Kwiatkowski M; Schlüter H; Schumacher U; Knecht R; Miller RJ
Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Apr; 48(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 26941063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative healing of rat fascia following incision with three surgical instruments.
Chang EI; Carlson GA; Vose JG; Huang EJ; Yang GP
J Surg Res; 2011 May; 167(1):e47-54. PubMed ID: 21324486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Healing of canine skin incisions made with monopolar electrosurgery versus scalpel blade.
Scott JE; Swanson EA; Cooley J; Wills RW; Pearce EC
Vet Surg; 2017 May; 46(4):520-529. PubMed ID: 28369982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrosurgery in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: principles, advances, and complications.
Smith TL; Smith JM
Laryngoscope; 2001 May; 111(5):769-80. PubMed ID: 11359154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of thermal knives on wound healing.
Sowa DE; Masterson BJ; Nealon N; von Fraunhofer JA
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Sep; 66(3):436-9. PubMed ID: 4022504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of mucosal incisions made by scalpel, CO2 laser, electrocautery, and constant-voltage electrocautery.
Liboon J; Funkhouser W; Terris DJ
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Mar; 116(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 9121794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative healing of surgical incisions created by the PEAK PlasmaBlade, conventional electrosurgery, and a scalpel.
Loh SA; Carlson GA; Chang EI; Huang E; Palanker D; Gurtner GC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Dec; 124(6):1849-1859. PubMed ID: 19952641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet and holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet lasers for incision of urethra and bladder neck in an in vivo porcine model.
Varkarakis IM; Inagaki T; Allaf ME; Chan TY; Rogers CG; Wright EJ; Fried NM
Urology; 2005 Jan; 65(1):191-5. PubMed ID: 15667902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear implant integrity after adenoidectomy with Coblation and monopolar electrosurgery.
Antonelli PJ; Baratelli R
Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 17162123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative healing of human cutaneous surgical incisions created by the PEAK PlasmaBlade, conventional electrosurgery, and a standard scalpel.
Ruidiaz ME; Messmer D; Atmodjo DY; Vose JG; Huang EJ; Kummel AC; Rosenberg HL; Gurtner GC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jul; 128(1):104-111. PubMed ID: 21701326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of glossectomy technique on histopathologic assessment in a rat model.
Kakarala K; Faquin WC; Deschler DG
Head Neck; 2011 Nov; 33(11):1576-80. PubMed ID: 21990222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrosurgical skin incision versus conventional scalpel: a prospective trial.
Dixon AR; Watkin DF
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1990 Oct; 35(5):299-301. PubMed ID: 2283608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the Shaw scalpel in podiatric surgery.
Marcinko DE; Field N; Barnett L
J Foot Surg; 1984; 23(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 6520347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the ultrasonic scalpel to CO2 laser and electrosurgery in terms of tissue injury and adhesion formation in a rabbit model.
Schemmel M; Haefner HK; Selvaggi SM; Warren JS; Termin CS; Hurd WW
Fertil Steril; 1997 Feb; 67(2):382-6. PubMed ID: 9022618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
