150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11211618)
1. Prothrombin measurement using a patient self-testing system. Oral Anticoagulation Monitoring Study Group.
Oral Anticoagulation Monitoring Study Group
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Feb; 115(2):280-7. PubMed ID: 11211618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assurance program for whole blood prothrombin time-international normalized ratio point-of-care monitors used for patient self-testing to control oral anticoagulation.
Tripodi A; Bressi C; Carpenedo M; Chantarangkul V; Clerici M; Mannucci PM
Thromb Res; 2004; 113(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15081563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.
Plesch W; Wolf T; Breitenbeck N; Dikkeschei LD; Cervero A; Perez PL; van den Besselaar AM
Thromb Res; 2008; 123(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 18585761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing. A comparison of CoaguChek S and XS INR measurements with hospital laboratory monitoring.
Ryan F; O'Shea S; Byrne S
Int J Lab Hematol; 2010 Feb; 32(1 Pt 1):e26-33. PubMed ID: 19032373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of patient capability to self-adjust oral anticoagulant dose: a multicenter study on home use of portable prothrombin time monitor (COAGUCHECK).
Cosmi B; Palareti G; Carpanedo M; Pengo V; Biasiolo A; Rampazzo P; Morstabilini G; Testa S
Haematologica; 2000 Aug; 85(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 10942929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Point-of-care prothrombin time measurement for professional and patient self-testing use. A multicenter clinical experience. Oral Anticoagulation Monitoring Study Group.
Oral Anticoagulation Monitoring Study Group
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Feb; 115(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 11211619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility, cost-effectiveness and patients' acceptance of point-of-care INR testing in a hospital-based anticoagulation clinic.
Kong MC; Lim TG; Ng HJ; Chan YH; Lee LH
Ann Hematol; 2008 Nov; 87(11):905-10. PubMed ID: 18604535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient self-testing is a reliable and acceptable alternative to laboratory INR monitoring.
Gardiner C; Williams K; Mackie IJ; Machin SJ; Cohen H
Br J Haematol; 2005 Jan; 128(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 15638860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a portable prothrombin time monitor for home use by patients who require long-term oral anticoagulant therapy.
Anderson DR; Harrison L; Hirsh J
Arch Intern Med; 1993 Jun; 153(12):1441-7. PubMed ID: 8512435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anticoagulation monitoring part 1: warfarin and parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors.
Spinler SA; Nutescu EA; Smythe MA; Wittkowsky AK
Ann Pharmacother; 2005 Jun; 39(6):1049-55. PubMed ID: 15855245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Point-of-care versus central laboratory coagulation testing during haemorrhagic surgery. A multicenter study.
Toulon P; Ozier Y; Ankri A; Fléron MH; Leroux G; Samama CM
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Feb; 101(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19190827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized controlled trial of supervised patient self-testing of warfarin therapy using an internet-based expert system.
Ryan F; Byrne S; O'Shea S
J Thromb Haemost; 2009 Aug; 7(8):1284-90. PubMed ID: 19496921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In-patient international normalized ratio self-testing instruction after mechanical heart valve implantation.
Thompson JL; Sundt TM; Sarano ME; Santrach PJ; Schaff HV
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Jun; 85(6):2046-50. PubMed ID: 18498817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Point of care monitors for oral anticoagulant therapy.
Nutescu EA
Semin Thromb Hemost; 2004 Dec; 30(6):697-702. PubMed ID: 15630676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Barriers to patient self-testing of prothrombin time: national survey of anticoagulation practitioners.
Wittkowsky AK; Sekreta CM; Nutescu EA; Ansell J
Pharmacotherapy; 2005 Feb; 25(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 15767240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).
Greenway A; Ignjatovic V; Summerhayes R; Newall F; Burgess J; DeRosa L; Monagle P
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jul; 102(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 19572081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is perioperative point-of-care prothrombin time testing accurate compared to the standard laboratory test?
Urwyler N; Staub LP; Beran D; Deplazes M; Lord SJ; Alberio L; Theiler L; Greif R
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Oct; 102(4):779-86. PubMed ID: 19806266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy through patient self-management and management by specialized anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands: a randomized clinical trial.
Gadisseur AP; Breukink-Engbers WG; van der Meer FJ; van den Besselaar AM; Sturk A; Rosendaal FR
Arch Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 163(21):2639-46. PubMed ID: 14638565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance evaluation of the new CoaguChek XS system compared with the established CoaguChek system by patients experienced in INR-self management.
Braun S; Watzke H; Hasenkam JM; Schwab M; Wolf T; Dovifat C; Völler H
Thromb Haemost; 2007 Feb; 97(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 17264962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical impact of point-of-care vs laboratory measurement of anticoagulation.
Sunderji R; Gin K; Shalansky K; Carter C; Chambers K; Davies C; Schwartz L; Fung A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 15842040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
