These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11211964)

  • 1. Retesting and follow-up of first-catch urines from men yield variable results with three Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid amplification tests.
    Nordbø SA; Lund K; Skjeldestad FE
    APMIS; 2000 Nov; 108(11):725-8. PubMed ID: 11211964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urine specimens from pregnant and nonpregnant women inhibitory to amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid by PCR, ligase chain reaction, and transcription-mediated amplification: identification of urinary substances associated with inhibition and removal of inhibitory activity.
    Mahony J; Chong S; Jang D; Luinstra K; Faught M; Dalby D; Sellors J; Chernesky M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3122-6. PubMed ID: 9774550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External quality assessment program for Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostic testing by nucleic acid amplification assays.
    Land S; Tabrizi S; Gust A; Johnson E; Garland S; Dax EM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 40(8):2893-6. PubMed ID: 12149347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of results obtained by performing a second ligase chain reaction assay and PCR analysis on urine samples with positive or near-cutoff results in the LCx test for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Castriciano S; Luinstra K; Jang D; Patel J; Mahony J; Kapala J; Chernesky M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Jul; 40(7):2632-4. PubMed ID: 12089293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of DNA amplification methods for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic military recruits.
    Stary A; Tomazic-Allen S; Choueiri B; Burczak J; Steyrer K; Lee H
    Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 8919734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a transcription-mediated amplification assay and polymerase chain reaction for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine.
    Pasternack R; Vuorinen P; Miettinen A
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1999 Feb; 18(2):142-4. PubMed ID: 10219580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pooling of urine specimens for detection of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections by PCR in a low-prevalence population: cost-saving strategy for epidemiological studies and screening programs.
    Morré SA; Meijer CJ; Munk C; Krüger-Kjaer S; Winther JF; Jørgensens HO; van Den Brule AJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Apr; 38(4):1679-80. PubMed ID: 10747169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vulvovaginal-swab or first-catch urine specimen to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women in a community setting?
    Skidmore S; Horner P; Herring A; Sell J; Paul I; Thomas J; Caul EO; Egger M; McCarthy A; Sanford E; Salisbury C; Macleod J; Sterne JA; Low N;
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 44(12):4389-94. PubMed ID: 17065268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary medicine clinic attendees: comparison of strand displacement amplification and the ligase chain reaction.
    McCartney RA; Walker J; Scoular A
    Br J Biomed Sci; 2001; 58(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 11788000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic review: noninvasive testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
    Cook RL; Hutchison SL; Østergaard L; Braithwaite RS; Ness RB
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(11):914-25. PubMed ID: 15941699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine samples by polymerase chain reaction and enzyme immunoassay.
    Ngeow YF; Hema V; Zakaria M; Lee CH; Ramachandran S
    Malays J Pathol; 1997 Dec; 19(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 10879253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimised sample DNA preparation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in synovial tissue by polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction.
    Freise J; Gérard HC; Bunke T; Whittum-Hudson JA; Zeidler H; Köhler L; Hudson AP; Kuipers JG
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2001 Feb; 60(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 11156547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening asymptomatic adolescent men for Chlamydia trachomatis in school-based health centers using urine-based nucleic acid amplification tests.
    Joffe A; Rietmeijer CA; Chung SE; Willard N; Chapin JB; Lloyd LV; Waterfield GA; Ellen JM; Gaydos C
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S19-23. PubMed ID: 18716568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of one-sample testing of self-obtained vaginal swabs and first catch urine samples separately and in combination for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by two amplified DNA assays in women visiting a sexually transmitted disease clinic.
    van Dommelen L; Dukers-Muijrers N; van Tiel FH; Brouwers EE; Hoebe CJ
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jun; 38(6):533-5. PubMed ID: 21217415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Volume effect on sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from females.
    Moncada J; Chow JM; Schachter J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Oct; 41(10):4842-3. PubMed ID: 14532238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limitations of screening tests for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic adolescent and young adult women.
    Shrier LA; Dean D; Klein E; Harter K; Rice PA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 190(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 15041995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Davies PO; Ridgway GL
    Int J STD AIDS; 1997 Dec; 8(12):731-8. PubMed ID: 9433945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification testing: our evaluation suggests that CDC-recommended approaches for confirmatory testing are ill-advised.
    Schachter J; Chow JM; Howard H; Bolan G; Moncada J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 44(7):2512-7. PubMed ID: 16825373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of urine, first and second endourethral swabs for PCR based detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male patients.
    Sugunendran H; Birley HD; Mallinson H; Abbott M; Tong CY
    Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Dec; 77(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 11714940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of strand displacement and ligase chain amplification for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urogenital specimens.
    Zeeberg B; Miörner H; Thelin I; Agren S; Schalén C
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2005 Sep; 11(9):761-4. PubMed ID: 16104993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.