These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

932 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11212628)

  • 1. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.
    Coltheart M; Rastle K; Perry C; Langdon R; Ziegler J
    Psychol Rev; 2001 Jan; 108(1):204-56. PubMed ID: 11212628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonword reading: comparing dual-route cascaded and connectionist dual-process models with human data.
    Pritchard SC; Coltheart M; Palethorpe S; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1268-88. PubMed ID: 22309087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational modelling of the effects of semantic dementia on visual word recognition.
    Coltheart M; Saunders SJ; Tree JJ
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2010 Mar; 27(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 20658385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [An attempt to integrate the dual route cascaded model and the triangle model for reading English words aloud].
    Asakawa S
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2005 Feb; 75(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 15782590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A patient with aphasia using the nonsemantic lexical route for Kanji reading.
    Hashimoto K; Uno A; Sambai A; Mizumoto G
    Neurocase; 2017; 23(5-6):270-277. PubMed ID: 29032699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: simulating individual differences and subtypes.
    Ziegler JC; Castel C; Pech-Georgel C; George F; Alario FX; Perry C
    Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):151-78. PubMed ID: 17959161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reading and visual word recognition ability in semantic dementia is not predicted by semantic performance.
    Playfoot D; Billington J; Tree JJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():292-306. PubMed ID: 29432768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neighborhood effects in reading aloud: new findings and new challenges for computational models.
    Mulatti C; Reynolds MG; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):799-810. PubMed ID: 16846280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NDRA: A single route model of response times in the reading aloud task based on discriminative learning.
    Hendrix P; Ramscar M; Baayen H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0218802. PubMed ID: 31365531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The electrophysiological correlates of developmental dyslexia: New insights from lexical decision and reading aloud in adults.
    Mahé G; Pont C; Zesiger P; Laganaro M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Dec; 121():19-27. PubMed ID: 30389554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developmental surface dyslexias.
    Friedmann N; Lukov L
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonological dyslexia and phonological impairment: an exception to the rule?
    Tree JJ; Kay J
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(14):2861-73. PubMed ID: 16879843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Computational Model of the Self-Teaching Hypothesis Based on the Dual-Route Cascaded Model of Reading.
    Pritchard SC; Coltheart M; Marinus E; Castles A
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Apr; 42(3):722-770. PubMed ID: 29566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The locus of serial processing in reading aloud: orthography-to-phonology computation or speech planning?
    Mousikou P; Rastle K; Besner D; Coltheart M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1076-99. PubMed ID: 25528095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Basic processes in reading: a critical review of pseudohomophone effects in reading aloud and a new computational account.
    Reynolds M; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):622-46. PubMed ID: 16447376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic impairment with and without surface dyslexia: Implications for models of reading.
    Blazely AM; Coltheart M; Casey BJ
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2005 Sep; 22(6):695-717. PubMed ID: 21038273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Additive and interactive effects of stimulus degradation: no challenge for CDP+.
    Ziegler JC; Perry C; Zorzi M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):306-11. PubMed ID: 19210104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lexical decision with pseudohomophones and reading in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia: A double dissociation.
    Boukadi M; Potvin K; Macoir J; Jr Laforce R; Poulin S; Brambati SM; Wilson MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jun; 86():45-56. PubMed ID: 27091585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A dual-route cascaded model of reading by deaf adults: evidence for grapheme to viseme conversion.
    Elliott EA; Braun M; Kuhlmann M; Jacobs AM
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 22159409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
    O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.