130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11213174)
21. Estimation of uncertainty in the sampling and analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soil in Brighton, UK.
Zhou JL; Siddiqui E; Ngo HH; Guo W
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Nov; 497-498():163-171. PubMed ID: 25128886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A flexible methodology for the characterisation of soils: a case study of the heavy metal status of a site at Dornach.
Bacon JR; Hudson G
Sci Total Environ; 2001 Jan; 264(1-2):153-62. PubMed ID: 11213177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Correlation of PCDD/F and PCB concentrations in soil samples from the Swiss soil monitoring network (NABO) to specific parameters of the observation sites.
Schmid P; Gujer E; Zennegg M; Bucheli TD; Desaules A
Chemosphere; 2005 Jan; 58(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15581925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Requirements for soil sampling in the context of ecosystem research.
Schleuss U; Müller F
Sci Total Environ; 2001 Jan; 264(1-2):193-7. PubMed ID: 11213184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Of the necessity of knowledge of the natural pedo-geochemical background content in the evaluation of the contamination of soils by trace elements.
Baize D; Sterckeman T
Sci Total Environ; 2001 Jan; 264(1-2):127-39. PubMed ID: 11213175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Balancing measurement uncertainty against financial benefits: comparison of in situ and ex situ analysis of contaminated land.
Taylor PD; Ramsey MH; Potts PJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Dec; 38(24):6824-31. PubMed ID: 15669345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Certification of a reference material for determination of total cyanide in soil to support implementation of the International Standard ISO 11262:2011.
Scharf H; Bremser W
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Apr; 407(11):3219-23. PubMed ID: 25213217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. European soil sampling guidelines for soil pollution studies.
Theocharopoulos SP; Wagner G; Sprengart J; Mohr ME; Desaules A; Muntau H; Christou M; Quevauviller P
Sci Total Environ; 2001 Jan; 264(1-2):51-62. PubMed ID: 11213188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Judging the fitness of on-site measurements by their uncertainty, including the contribution from sampling.
Boon KA; Ramsey MH
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Mar; 419():196-207. PubMed ID: 22289173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. ELPAT program report: background and current status.
Grunder FI
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):541-4. PubMed ID: 12929686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. PAH and PCB in soils of Switzerland--status and critical review.
Desaules A; Ammann S; Blum F; Brändli RC; Bucheli TD; Keller A
J Environ Monit; 2008 Nov; 10(11):1265-77. PubMed ID: 18974895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Distribution of pesticide residues in soil and uncertainty of sampling.
Suszter GK; Ambrus Á
J Environ Sci Health B; 2017 Aug; 52(8):557-563. PubMed ID: 28489977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validated sampling strategy for assessing contaminants in soil stockpiles.
Lamé F; Honders T; Derksen G; Gadella M
Environ Pollut; 2005 Mar; 134(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 15572219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A multi-stage sampling strategy for the delineation of soil pollution in a contaminated brownfield.
Verstraete S; Van Meirvenne M
Environ Pollut; 2008 Jul; 154(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 18068880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Using reference materials to improve the quality of data generated by USEPA analytical methods.
Nagourney SJ; Wilson SA; Long SE
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Dec; 18(12):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 27892563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of analytical error and sampling error for contaminated soil.
Gustavsson B; Luthbom K; Lagerkvist A
J Hazard Mater; 2006 Nov; 138(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 17030410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improved evaluation of measurement uncertainty from sampling by inclusion of between-sampler bias using sampling proficiency testing.
Ramsey MH; Geelhoed B; Wood R; Damant AP
Analyst; 2011 Apr; 136(7):1313-21. PubMed ID: 21279235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An investigation of the impact of left-censored soil contamination data on the uncertainty of descriptive statistical parameters.
Shoari N; Dubé JS
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2623-2631. PubMed ID: 26946089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. EUROSOILS--a set of CRMs for comparability of soil-measurements.
Gawlik BM; Lamberty A; Muntau H; Pauwels J
Fresenius J Anal Chem; 2001 Jun; 370(2-3):220-3. PubMed ID: 11451240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accreditation and recognition of soil sampling evidence of competence for testing laboratories in Germany.
Berger W
Sci Total Environ; 2001 Jan; 264(1-2):199-204. PubMed ID: 11213185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
