492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11213922)
1. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Almond PR; Biggs PJ; Coursey BM; Hanson WF; Huq MS; Nath R; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1847-70. PubMed ID: 10505874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the recommendations of the AAPM TG-51 and TG-51 addendum reference dosimetry protocols.
McCaw TJ; Hwang MS; Jang SY; Huq MS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 18(4):140-143. PubMed ID: 28574211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reference dose determination in 60Co and high-energy radiotherapy photon beams by using Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers - an experimental investigation.
Swanpalmer J
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045003. PubMed ID: 33444264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water.
Kinoshita N; Oguchi H; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T; Shioura H; Kimura H; Doi K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):271-278. PubMed ID: 28771919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Absorbed dose measurement of photon beam with Farmer-type ionization chambers in Japanese dosimetry protocols].
Fujisaki T; Hiraoka T; Osawa A; Nakajima M; Kuwabara A; Yokoyama K; Saitoh H; Tomaru T; Inada T
Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 15226645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.
Huq MS; Nath R
Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
