263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11213922)
21. A comparison of methods for calibrating parallel-plate chambers/.
Reft CS; Kuchnir FT; DeWerd LA; Micka J; Attix FH
Med Phys; 1994 Dec; 21(12):1953-7. PubMed ID: 7700203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Verification of absorbed dose determined with plane-parallel chambers in clinical electron beams following AAPM Task Group 39 protocol using ferrous sulphate dosimetry.
Xu Z; Li H; Almond PR; Guan TY
Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):377-81. PubMed ID: 8815380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Electron dosimetry based on the absorbed dose to water concept: a comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and DIN 6800-2 protocols.
Dohm OS; Christ G; Nüsslin F; Schüle E; Bruggmoser G
Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2258-64. PubMed ID: 11764030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A new approach to electron-beam reference dosimetry.
Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 9547498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Proton dosimetry intercomparison based on the ICRU report 59 protocol.
Vatnitsky S; Moyers M; Miller D; Abell G; Slater JM; Pedroni E; Coray A; Mazal A; Newhauser W; Jaekel O; Heese J; Fukumura A; Futami Y; Verhey L; Daftari I; Grusell E; Molokanov A; Bloch C
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10435822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The advantages of absorbed-dose calibration factors.
Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1227-39. PubMed ID: 1435604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Verification of absorbed doses determined with thimble and parallel-plate ionization chambers in clinical electron beams using ferrous sulphate dosimetry.
Van der Plaetsen A; Seuntjens J; Thierens H; Vynckier S
Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 8164587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of dose calibration by ionometric and chemical dosimetry for 6- and 45-MV x-ray beams.
Zwicker RD; Wu A; Sternick ES
Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1251-3. PubMed ID: 1753913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nw versus Nk ion chamber calibrations.
Medin J; Andreo P; Grusell E; Mattsson O; Montelius A; Roos M
Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1161-76. PubMed ID: 7568375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of humidity and other correction factors in the AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocol.
Rogers DW; Ross CK
Med Phys; 1988; 15(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 3352550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Calorimetric determination of the absorbed dose-to-water beam quality correction factor kQ for high-energy photon beams.
Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1749-52. PubMed ID: 8587528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correction factors for Farmer-type chambers for absorbed dose determination in 60Co and 192Ir brachytherapy dosimetry.
Tölli H; Johansson KA
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3171-81. PubMed ID: 9832009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The status of high-energy photon and electron beam dosimetry five years after the implementation of the IAEA Code of Practice in the Nordic countries.
Andreo P
Acta Oncol; 1993; 32(5):483-500. PubMed ID: 8217232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A multicenter study of modified electron beam output calibration.
Mahfirotin DA; Ferliano B; Handika AD; Asril YS; Fadli M; Ryangga D; Nelly N; Kurniawan E; Wibowo WE; Yadav P; Pawiro SA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e14232. PubMed ID: 38088260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Wall correction factors for calibration of plane-parallel ionization chambers with high-energy photon beams.
Araki F; Ikeda R; Shirakawa Y; Shimonobou T; Moribe N; Takada T; Takahashi M; Oura H; Matoba M
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):2509-17. PubMed ID: 11008952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A formulation for high-energy photon and electron beam dosimetry.
Shiragai A
Phys Med Biol; 1991 May; 36(5):633-42. PubMed ID: 2068228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The implementation of the AAPM Task Group 21 protocol by the Radiological Physics Center and its implications.
Gastorf RJ; Hanson WF; Shalek RJ; Berkley LW
Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 6434921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. How water equivalent are water-equivalent solid materials for output calibration of photon and electron beams?
Tello VM; Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 1995 Jul; 22(7):1177-89. PubMed ID: 7565393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of dosimetry recommendations for clinical proton beams.
Medin J; Andreo P; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Nov; 45(11):3195-211. PubMed ID: 11098898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The protocols and codes of practice used for the determination of absorbed dose in megavoltage photon and electron beams.
Weatherburn H; Nisbet A
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1991; 19(2-3):147-80. PubMed ID: 1769240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
