These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11214020)

  • 21. A comparison of dense-to-lean and fixed lean schedules of alternative reinforcement and extinction.
    Hagopian LP; Toole LM; Long ES; Bowman LG; Lieving GA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15529889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does functional communication training compete with ongoing contingencies of reinforcement? An analysis during response acquisition and maintenance.
    Shirley MJ; Iwata BA; Kahng SW; Mazaleski JL; Lerman DC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 9157100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Noncontingent reinforcement: a further examination of schedule effects during treatment.
    Wallace MD; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Thompson RH; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 23322927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using brief assessments to evaluate aberrant behavior maintained by attention.
    O'Reilly MF; Lancioni GE; King L; Lally G; Dhomhnaill ON
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 10738961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the effects of noncontingent delivery of differing magnitudes of reinforcement.
    Carr JE; Bailey JS; Ecott CL; Lucker KD; Weil TM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 9757577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Competition between noncontingent and contingent reinforcement schedules during response acquisition.
    Goh HL; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 10885527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of stimulus generalization gradients in the treatment of self-injurious behavior.
    Lalli JS; Mace FC; Livezey K; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(3):479-83. PubMed ID: 9757586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. DRO contingencies: an analysis of variable-momentary schedules.
    Lindberg JS; Iwata BA; Kahng S; DeLeon IG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(2):123-35; quiz 135-6. PubMed ID: 10396766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transfer of behavioral function as a contributing factor in treatment relapse.
    Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Smith RG; Zarcone JR; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(2):357-70. PubMed ID: 8063634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A review of "noncontingent" reinforcement as treatment for the aberrant behavior of individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Carr JE; Coriaty S; Wilder DA; Gaunt BT; Dozier CL; Britton LN; Avina C; Reed CL
    Res Dev Disabil; 2000; 21(5):377-91. PubMed ID: 11100801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Behavioral assessment and treatment of self-injurious behavior in autism.
    Minshawi NF
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2008 Oct; 17(4):875-86, x. PubMed ID: 18775375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Current research on the influence of establishing operations on behavior in applied settings.
    Iwata BA; Smith RG; Michael J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 11214019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Noncontingent reinforcement: Arbitrary versus maintaining reinforcers for escape-maintained problem behavior.
    Newman ZA; Roscoe EM; Errera NP; Davis CR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):984-1000. PubMed ID: 33667327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment and treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from attention and access to tangible items.
    Hagopian LP; Wilson DM; Wilder DA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 11421317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relative influences of establishing operations and reinforcement contingencies on self-injurious behavior during functional analyses.
    Worsdell AS; Iwata BA; Conners J; Kahng SW; Thompson RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):451-61. PubMed ID: 11214022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Competing stimuli in the treatment of multiply controlled problem behavior during hygiene routines.
    Long ES; Hagopian LP; Deleon IG; Marhefka JM; Resau D
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 15590238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Schedule effects of noncontingent reinforcement on attention-maintained destructive behavior in identical quadruplets.
    Hagopian LP; Fisher WW; Legacy SM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 8063630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the relative contributions of noncontingent reinforcement and escape extinction in the treatment of food refusal.
    Reed GK; Piazza CC; Patel MR; Layer SA; Bachmeyer MH; Bethke SD; Gutshall KA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 15154213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Operative mechanisms of noncontingent reinforcement at varying magnitudes and schedules.
    Wilder DA; Fisher WW; Anders BM; Cercone JJ; Neidert PL
    Res Dev Disabil; 2001; 22(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 11325159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.