These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11214029)

  • 1. Preference for unreliable reinforcement in children with mental retardation: the role of conditioned reinforcement.
    Lalli JS; Mauro BC; Mace FC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):533-44. PubMed ID: 11214029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Establishing preference for unreliable reinforcement in adults with dual diagnoses.
    Rehfeldt RA; Randich L
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Aug; 93(1):161-74. PubMed ID: 14563045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Rainville B; Adelinis JD; Crosland K; Kogan J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 9316256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Piazza CC; Crosland K; Gotjen D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 9316257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems.
    Peck SM; Wacker DP; Berg WK; Cooper LJ; Brown KA; Richman D; McComas JJ; Frischmeyer P; Millard T
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(3):263-90. PubMed ID: 8810061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of resistance to change with unconditioned and conditioned reinforcers.
    Vargo KK; Ringdahl JE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):643-62. PubMed ID: 26119287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multicomponent approach to thinning reinforcer delivery during noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Slocum SK; Grauerholz-Fisher E; Peters KP; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 29226346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response allocation to concurrent fixed-ratio reinforcement schedules with work requirements by adults with mental retardation and typical preschool children.
    Cuvo AJ; Lerch LJ; Leurquin DA; Gaffaney TJ; Poppen RL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 9532750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement schedules as treatment for aberrant behavior.
    Marcus BA; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 8881343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.
    Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Kahng S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):479-93. PubMed ID: 10641302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.
    Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Lalli JS; Daniel D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 10641300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antecedent manipulations in a tangible condition: effects of stimulus preference on aggression.
    Mueller MM; Wilczynski SM; Moore JW; Fusilier I; Trahant D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 11421319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How should periods without social interaction be scheduled? Children's preference for practical schedules of positive reinforcement.
    Luczynski KC; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):500-22. PubMed ID: 24890928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variable-time reinforcement schedules in the treatment of socially maintained problem behavior.
    Van Camp CM; Lerman DC; Kelley ME; Contrucci SA; Vorndran CM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):545-57. PubMed ID: 11214030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decreasing excessive functional communication responses while treating destructive behavior using response restriction.
    Fisher WW; Greer BD; Querim AC; DeRosa N
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2614-23. PubMed ID: 25036315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extinction and DRO in the treatment of aggression in a boy with severe mental retardation.
    Figueroa RG; Thyer BA; Thyer KB
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1992 Jun; 23(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 1460100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Graff RB; Gibson L
    Behav Modif; 2003 Sep; 27(4):470-83. PubMed ID: 12971123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of reinforcer pairing and fading on preschoolers' snack selections.
    Solberg KM; Hanley GP; Layer SA; Ingvarsson ET
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(4):633-44. PubMed ID: 18189095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of conditioned reinforcement rate on choice: a review.
    Fantino E; Romanowich P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 May; 87(3):409-21. PubMed ID: 17575906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.