These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11214030)

  • 1. Variable-time reinforcement schedules in the treatment of socially maintained problem behavior.
    Van Camp CM; Lerman DC; Kelley ME; Contrucci SA; Vorndran CM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):545-57. PubMed ID: 11214030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The reductive effects of noncontingent reinforcement fixed-time versus variable-time schedules.
    Carr JE; Kellum KK; Chong IM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):505-9. PubMed ID: 11800191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noncontingent reinforcement: a further examination of schedule effects during treatment.
    Wallace MD; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Thompson RH; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 23322927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noncontingent reinforcement without extinction plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior during treatment of problem behavior.
    Fritz JN; Jackson LM; Stiefler NA; Wimberly BS; Richardson AR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Jul; 50(3):590-599. PubMed ID: 28513826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations.
    Lalli JS; Casey SD; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):127-36; quiz 136-7. PubMed ID: 9103988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multicomponent approach to thinning reinforcer delivery during noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Slocum SK; Grauerholz-Fisher E; Peters KP; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 29226346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fixed-time schedule effects as a function of baseline reinforcement rate.
    Ringdahl JE; Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Connell JE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 11317982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the effects of noncontingent delivery of differing magnitudes of reinforcement.
    Carr JE; Bailey JS; Ecott CL; Lucker KD; Weil TM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 9757577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noncontingent reinforcement: Arbitrary versus maintaining reinforcers for escape-maintained problem behavior.
    Newman ZA; Roscoe EM; Errera NP; Davis CR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):984-1000. PubMed ID: 33667327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Operative mechanisms of noncontingent reinforcement at varying magnitudes and schedules.
    Wilder DA; Fisher WW; Anders BM; Cercone JJ; Neidert PL
    Res Dev Disabil; 2001; 22(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 11325159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of noncontingent reinforcement on problem behavior and stimulus engagement: the role of satiation, extinction, and alternative reinforcement.
    Hagopian LP; Crockett JL; van Stone M; DeLeon IG; Bowman LG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):433-49. PubMed ID: 11214021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noncontingent reinforcement: effects of satiation versus choice responding.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; DeLeon IG; Piazza CC; Kuhn DE; Rodriguez-Catter V; Adelinis JD
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(6):411-27. PubMed ID: 10641251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
    Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An empirical analysis of two forms of extinction to treat aggression.
    O'Reilly M; Lancioni G; Taylor I
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(5):315-25. PubMed ID: 10542967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Kahng SW; Iwata BA; Thompson RH; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):419-32. PubMed ID: 11214020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fixed-time schedules attenuate extinction-induced phenomena in the treatment of severe aberrant behavior.
    Vollmer TR; Progar PR; Lalli JS; Van Camp CM; Sierp BJ; Wright CS; Nastasi J; Eisenschink KJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 9891392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of noncontingent reinforcement on an arbitrary response in domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris).
    Pfaller-Sadovsky N; Hurtado-Parrado C; Arnott G
    Behav Processes; 2022 Nov; 203():104770. PubMed ID: 36283576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Schedule effects of noncontingent reinforcement on attention-maintained destructive behavior in identical quadruplets.
    Hagopian LP; Fisher WW; Legacy SM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 8063630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement: implications for the use of extinction with problem behavior in clinical settings.
    Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Shore BA; Kahng SW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):153-71. PubMed ID: 8682734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A variation of noncontingent reinforcement in the treatment of aberrant behavior.
    Britton LN; Carr JE; Kellum KK; Dozier CL; Weil TM
    Res Dev Disabil; 2000; 21(6):425-35. PubMed ID: 11153827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.