These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11214030)

  • 21. The effects of extinction, noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior as control procedures.
    Thompson RH; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Dozier CL; Samaha AL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(2):221-38. PubMed ID: 12858986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of noncontingent delivery of high- and low-preference stimuli on attention-maintained destructive behavior.
    Fisher WW; O'Connor JT; Kurtz PF; DeLeon IG; Gotjen DL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 10738954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of alternative responses on behavior exposed to noncontingent reinforcement.
    Virues-Ortega J; Iwata BA; Fahmie TA; Harper JM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):603-12. PubMed ID: 24114223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of reinforcement schedules to increase independent responding in individuals with intellectual disabilities.
    Hausman NL; Ingvarsson ET; Kahng S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 24114759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How should periods without social interaction be scheduled? Children's preference for practical schedules of positive reinforcement.
    Luczynski KC; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):500-22. PubMed ID: 24890928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of fixed-time reinforcement schedules on resurgence of problem behavior.
    Marsteller TM; St Peter CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):455-69. PubMed ID: 24844682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reduction of aggression evoked by sounds using noncontingent reinforcement and time-out.
    Dupuis DL; Lerman DC; Tsami L; Shireman ML
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 26118940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior.
    DeLeon IG; Neidert PL; Anders BM; Rodriguez-Catter V
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):521-5. PubMed ID: 11800194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A review of "noncontingent" reinforcement as treatment for the aberrant behavior of individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Carr JE; Coriaty S; Wilder DA; Gaunt BT; Dozier CL; Britton LN; Avina C; Reed CL
    Res Dev Disabil; 2000; 21(5):377-91. PubMed ID: 11100801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Combining noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement schedules as treatment for aberrant behavior.
    Marcus BA; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 8881343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Krug A
    Behav Modif; 2000 Jan; 24(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 10641365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A component analysis of schedule thinning during functional communication training.
    Betz AM; Fisher WW; Roane HS; Mintz JC; Owen TM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(1):219-41. PubMed ID: 24114096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Brief report: Signals enhance the suppressive effects of noncontingent reinforcement.
    Ringdahl JE; Call NA; Christensen T; Boelter EW
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2010 Mar; 40(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 19777331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of continuous and intermittent reinforcement for problem behavior during functional communication training.
    Worsdell AS; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Thompson RH; Kahng SW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 10885525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An integrated model for guiding the selection of treatment components for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
    Berg WK; Wacker DP; Ringdahl JE; Stricker J; Vinquist K; Salil Kumar Dutt A; Dolezal D; Luke J; Kemmerer L; Mews J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):617-38. PubMed ID: 26990962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
    Glover AC; Roane HS; Kadey HJ; Grow LL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 18595281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of noncontingent reinforcement and sensory extinction as treatments for self-injurious behavior.
    Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Goh HL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):635-46. PubMed ID: 9891399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of dense-to-lean and fixed lean schedules of alternative reinforcement and extinction.
    Hagopian LP; Toole LM; Long ES; Bowman LG; Lieving GA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15529889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Teacher-conducted trial-based functional analyses as the basis for intervention.
    Bloom SE; Lambert JM; Dayton E; Samaha AL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(1):208-18. PubMed ID: 24114095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training.
    Hanley GP; Iwata BA; Thompson RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 11317985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.