210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11215286)
1. The appropriateness of examining the entire cervix histologically in hysterectomy specimens from women with a previous history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or dyskaryosis.
Greene A; Heatley MK
J Clin Pathol; 2001 Feb; 54(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 11215286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cytological follow-up of women older than 50 years with high-grade cervical smear treated by large loop excision.
Das N; Sutton V; Bevan J; Brinkmann D; Woolas R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jul; 13(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 19550214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors for residual disease in the uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Hamontri S; Israngura N; Rochanawutanon M; Bullangpoti S; Tangtrakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Feb; 93 Suppl 2():S74-80. PubMed ID: 21299083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Morphological observation of cone biopsy and hysterectomy specimens of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Chen XD; Shi HY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 43(6):429-32. PubMed ID: 19035137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determinants of high-grade dysplasia among women with mild dyskaryosis on cervical smear.
Parazzini F; Sideri M; Restelli S; Schettino F; Chatenoud L; Crosignani PG
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 86(5):754-7. PubMed ID: 7566843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jarmulowicz MR; Jenkins D; Barton SE; Goodall AL; Hollingworth A; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1061-6. PubMed ID: 2804008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recurrent smear abnormalities where repeat loop treatment is not possible: is hysterectomy the answer?
Das N; Naik R; Jackson S; De Barros Lopes A; Monaghan JM; Godfrey KA; Hatem MH
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Jun; 97(3):751-4. PubMed ID: 15943984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic damage in exfoliated cells of the uterine cervix. Association and interaction between cigarette smoking and progression to malignant transformation?
Cerqueira EM; Santoro CL; Donozo NF; Freitas BA; Pereira CA; Bevilacqua RG; Machado-Santelli GM
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 9622681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cytological and histological outcome following a borderline cervical smear.
Rawal N; Saridogan E; Weekes AW; Haq Khan N
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):419-21. PubMed ID: 12881086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How significant is a cervical smear showing glandular dyskaryosis?
Pisal NV; Sindos M; Desai S; Mansell E; Singer A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Jun; 108(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 12781413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for discrepancy: do preoperative factors predict presence of significant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Matthews KS; Rocconi RP; Case AS; Estes JM; Straughn JM; Huh WK
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Apr; 11(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 17415109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Postoperative verification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade].
Starzewski J; Góźdź S; Chil A; Piasek G; Plutecki J; Smorag L; Dembowska R; Krawczyk J
Wiad Lek; 2003; 56(3-4):162-6. PubMed ID: 12923964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of the diagnosis in suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix.
Myllynen L; Karjalainen O
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1984; 73(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 6732157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distribution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: are hysterectomy specimens sampled appropriately?
Heatley M
J Clin Pathol; 1995 Apr; 48(4):323-4. PubMed ID: 7615850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
