These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11215924)

  • 1. Accurate measures of left ventricular ejection fraction using electron beam tomography: a comparison with radionuclide angiography, and cine angiography.
    Baik HK; Budoff MJ; Lane KL; Bakhsheshi H; Brundage BH
    Int J Card Imaging; 2000 Oct; 16(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 11215924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease assessed by gated tomographic myocardial perfusion images. Comparison with assessment by contrast ventriculography and first-pass radionuclide angiography.
    Williams KA; Taillon LA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):173-81. PubMed ID: 8522692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by Tc-99m sestamibi first-pass angiography with electron beam computed tomography in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction.
    Gerber TC; Behrenbeck T; Allison T; Mullan BP; Rumberger JA; Gibbons RJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1999 Apr; 83(7):1022-6. PubMed ID: 10190513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correspondence of left ventricular ejection fraction determinations from two-dimensional echocardiography, radionuclide angiography and contrast cineangiography.
    Naik MM; Diamond GA; Pai T; Soffer A; Siegel RJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Mar; 25(4):937-42. PubMed ID: 7884101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with quantitative gated SPECT: accuracy and correlation with first-pass radionuclide angiography.
    Vallejo E; Dione DP; Sinusas AJ; Wackers FJ
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2000; 7(5):461-70. PubMed ID: 11083195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of LV mass and volume measurements derived from electron beam tomography using cine imaging and angiographic imaging.
    Mao S; Takasu J; Child J; Carson S; Oudiz R; Budoff MJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2003 Oct; 19(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 14609196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Determination of ejection fraction and left ventricular fraction using isotopic ventriculography and bidimensional echocardiography. Comparison with contrast ventriculography].
    Casáns Tormo I; Gómez Aldaravi R; Bodí Peris V; Sanchis Forés J; Ciudad Platero J; Insa Pérez L; Manjón Soriano J
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1998; 51 Suppl 1():10-8. PubMed ID: 9549395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The right ventricle in mitral regurgitation: evaluation by electron beam tomography.
    Shields JP; Watson P; Mielke CH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Sep; 4(5):490-4; discussion 494-5. PubMed ID: 8581191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging].
    Koch K; Oellig F; Kunz P; Bender P; Oberholzer K; Mildenberger P; Hake U; Kreitner KF; Thelen M
    Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1786-93. PubMed ID: 15573290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing the method to calculate right ventricular ejection fraction from first-pass data acquired with a multicrystal camera.
    Johnson LL; Lawson MA; Blackwell GG; Tauxe EL; Russell K; Dell'Italia LJ
    J Nucl Cardiol; 1995; 2(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 9420816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using 4-channel MDCT.
    Boehm T; Alkadhi H; Roffi M; Willmann JK; Desbiolles LM; Marincek B; Wildermuth S
    Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 15088177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of cardiac ejection fraction and left ventricular volume: contrast-enhanced ultrafast cine MR imaging vs IV digital subtraction ventriculography.
    Matsumura K; Nakase E; Haiyama T; Takeo K; Shimizu K; Yamasaki K; Kohno K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):979-85. PubMed ID: 8470613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using fast steady-state cine MR imaging: comparison with left ventricular angiography.
    Ichikawa Y; Sakuma H; Kitagawa K; Ishida N; Takeda K; Uemura S; Motoyasu M; Nakano T; Nozaki A
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2003; 5(2):333-42. PubMed ID: 12765112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction by cine computed tomography and single plane right anterior oblique ventriculography.
    MacMillan RM; Rees MR; Maranhao V; Clark DL
    Angiology; 1986 Apr; 37(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 3717695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction by ultrafast computed tomography.
    MacMillan RM; Rees MR
    Angiology; 1988 Mar; 39(3 Pt 1):203-10. PubMed ID: 3354922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with late-systolic and mid-diastolic cardiac phases using multi-slice computed tomography.
    Spitzer E; Pavo N; Abdelghani M; Beitzke D; Ren B; García-Ruiz V; Goliasch G; Gottsauner-Wolf M; Kaneider A; Garcia-Garcia HM; Soliman OII; Wolf F; Loewe C
    Radiography (Lond); 2018 Nov; 24(4):e85-e90. PubMed ID: 30292518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Normal left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment with quantitative digital cardioangiography.
    Masquet C; Slama MS; Dibie A; Sheehan FH; Liénard J
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Feb; 14(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 9559376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Determination of left ventricular function parameters and myocardial mass: comparison of MRI and EBT].
    Kivelitz DE; Enzweiler CN; Wiese TH; Lembcke A; Borges A; Zytowski M; Taupitz M; Hamm B
    Rofo; 2000 Mar; 172(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 10778455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ejection fractions determined by cardiac computed tomographic angiography and single photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging are not interchangeable: evidence of significant and sex-associated disparities.
    Mehta A; Travin MI; Levsky JM; Jain VR; Burton WB; Haramati LB
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):489-97. PubMed ID: 19638838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision of measurements of right and left ventricular volume by cine computed tomography.
    Reiter SJ; Rumberger JA; Feiring AJ; Stanford W; Marcus ML
    Circulation; 1986 Oct; 74(4):890-900. PubMed ID: 3757197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.