These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks. Hübner R; Lehle C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming. Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation. Buetti S; Kerzel D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):816-34. PubMed ID: 19485694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ERP topography and human perceptual learning in the peripheral visual field. Shoji H; Skrandies W Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 16356572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. Theeuwes J; Van der Burg E J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1335-51. PubMed ID: 18085947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of spatial attention on invisible stimuli. Shin K; Stolte M; Chong SC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1507-13. PubMed ID: 19801611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects. Hommuk K; Bachmann T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference. Shin YK; Proctor RW Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Looking at the bright side: the affective monitoring of direction. Phaf RH; Rotteveel M Emotion; 2009 Oct; 9(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 19803594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective view of the impact of prime validity on response speed and selection in the arrow classification task with free choice trials. Perry JR; Lupker SJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 20139465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Miller J; Alderton M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]