BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11216912)

  • 1. Computed direct magnification radiography of bone tumors.
    Hillmann A; Link TM; Ozaki T; Vestring T; Winkelmann W
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2001 Feb; 127(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 11216912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imaging of bone tumors: evaluation of direct magnification radiography.
    Link TM; Hillmann A; Erlemann R; Grönefeld A; Häussler M; Heppe AE; Vestring T; Peters PE
    Skeletal Radiol; 1996 Jul; 25(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 8837275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial bone erosions: detection with magnification radiography versus conventional high-resolution radiography.
    Link TM; Rummeny EJ; Lenzen H; Reuter I; Roos N; Peters PE
    Radiology; 1994 Sep; 192(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 8058961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Value of direct radiographic enlargement (DIMA) in early detection of rheumatic inflammatory lesions. Comparative evaluation with high resolution conventional imaging technique].
    Link TM; Fiebich M; Gaubitz M; Krause F; Vestring T; Schneider M; Peters PE
    Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):405-10. PubMed ID: 7938489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis for evaluation of bone tumors and tumor-like lesions: a comparison with radiography.
    Park S; Lee IS; Song YS; Bae JH; Kim JI; Kim CW
    Acta Radiol; 2022 Aug; 63(8):1086-1092. PubMed ID: 34260321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial Characterization of Focal Bone Lesions with Conventional Radiographs or Computed Tomography: Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement Assessment.
    Gondim Teixeira PA; Lombard C; Moustache-Espinola P; Germain E; Gillet R; Hossu G; Jaquet Ribeiro G; Blum A
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2023 May; 74(2):404-414. PubMed ID: 36207066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver Variability in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign Bone Tumors and Tumor-like Lesions.
    Scheitza P; Uhl M; Hauschild O; Zwingmann J; Bannasch H; Kayser C; Südkamp NP; Herget GW
    Rofo; 2016 May; 188(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 26815281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Direct radiographic magnification of the hands. A critical analysis].
    Presacco D; Pellegrini A; Di Maggio C
    Radiol Med; 1987 Mar; 73(3):159-61. PubMed ID: 3562912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Direct radiographic magnification: a contribution to the study of bone pathology].
    Gattoni F; Pozzato C; Baldini U; Mazzoni R; Nessi R; Uslenghi C
    Radiol Med; 1983; 69(7-8):513-8. PubMed ID: 6669739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical use of magnification radiography in rheumatologic differential diagnosis].
    Link TM; Gaubitz M; Lenzen H; Müller-Miny H; Schneider M; Peters PE
    Z Rheumatol; 1993; 52(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 8368021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct radiographic magnification for skeletal radiology. An assessment of image quality and clinical application.
    Genant HK; Doi K; Mall JC; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1977 Apr; 123(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 847172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of magnification radiography in bone tumors.
    Langlotz M; Cserhati M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978); 1980; 97(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 7458595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Differential diagnostic problems in assessment of benign bone tumors].
    Lang S; Sulzbacher I
    Radiologe; 2001 Jul; 41(7):533-9. PubMed ID: 11490773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnosis of gastric cancers: comparison of conventional radiography and digital radiography with a 4 million-pixel charge-coupled device.
    Iinuma G; Ushio K; Ishikawa T; Nawano S; Sekiguchi R; Satake M
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 10671599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. Part III: matrix patterns.
    Sweet DE; Madewell JE; Ragsdale BD
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1981 Dec; 19(4):785-814. PubMed ID: 7323292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging Features of Bone Tumors: Conventional Radiographs and MR Imaging Correlation.
    Gemescu IN; Thierfelder KM; Rehnitz C; Weber MA
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2019 Nov; 27(4):753-767. PubMed ID: 31575404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Detection of small bone lesions with digital radiography using storage phosphors].
    Salvini E; Zincone G; Fossati N; Crivellaro M; Crespi A; Loda A; Paruccini N; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):705-8. PubMed ID: 2057602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of teleradiology in skeletal disorders: solitary bone lesions and fractures.
    Martel J; Jiménez MD; Martín-Santos FJ; López-Alonso A
    J Telemed Telecare; 1995; 1(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 9375113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.