These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11217720)

  • 1. A practical approach to exposure assessment programs in the private sector: a partial validation study of a qualitative chemical exposure assessment model.
    Dunham ML; Bullock WH; Oestenstad RK
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Feb; 16(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 11217720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Recent prevention strategies and occupational risk analysis: Control Banding and Sobane].
    Ghittori S; Ferrari M; Negri S; Serranti P; Sacco P; Biffi R; Imbriani M
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2006; 28(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 16705887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm.
    Tielemans E; Noy D; Schinkel J; Heussen H; Van Der Schaaf D; West J; Fransman W
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):443-54. PubMed ID: 18621742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Company-level, semi-quantitative assessment of occupational styrene exposure when individual data are not available.
    Kolstad HA; Sønderskov J; Burstyn I
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Mar; 49(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 15734828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hazardous chemical exposure: guidelines for the optometric office.
    Moates KN; Miller SC
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Apr; 68(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 9150658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
    Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
    Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surveillance of Washington OSHA exposure data to identify uncharacterized or emerging occupational health hazards.
    Lofgren DJ; Reeb-Whitaker CK; Adams D
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jul; 7(7):375-88. PubMed ID: 20408016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. History and evolution of control banding: a review.
    Zalk DM; Nelson DI
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 May; 5(5):330-46. PubMed ID: 18350442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of a task-based exposure assessment model (T-BEAM) for assessment of metal fume exposures during welding and thermal cutting.
    Susi P; Goldberg M; Barnes P; Stafford E
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Jan; 15(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 10660986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Default values for assessment of potential dermal exposure of the hands to industrial chemicals in the scope of regulatory risk assessments.
    Marquart H; Warren ND; Laitinen J; van Hemmen JJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jul; 50(5):469-89. PubMed ID: 16540540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practicing chemical process safety: a look at the layers of protection.
    Sanders RE
    J Hazard Mater; 2004 Nov; 115(1-3):141-7. PubMed ID: 15518976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tools for regulatory assessment of occupational exposure: development and challenges.
    Tielemans E; Warren N; Schneider T; Tischer M; Ritchie P; Goede H; Kromhout H; Van Hemmen J; Cherrie JW
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 1():S72-80. PubMed ID: 17622251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Application of predictive model to estimate concentrations of chemical substances in the work environment].
    Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Czerczak S; Jakubowski M; Maciaszek P; Janasik B
    Med Pr; 2010; 61(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 20677430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the predictive abilities of a qualitative exposure assessment model.
    Elliott LJ; Oestenstad RK
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):440-7. PubMed ID: 17474034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health hazard labeling for hazard communication in the pharmaceutical industry.
    Sussman RG; Kimmel TA; Neske FW
    Occup Med; 1997; 12(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 9153056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing workplace chemical exposures: the role of exposure monitoring.
    Harper M
    J Environ Monit; 2004 May; 6(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 15152307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exposure assessment in the occupational setting.
    Stewart P; Stenzel M
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 May; 15(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 10808266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Before the storm: informing and involving stakeholder groups in workplace biomarker monitoring.
    Musham C; Trettin L; Jablonski R
    J Public Health Policy; 1999; 20(3):319-34. PubMed ID: 10874405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of potential toxicity from co-exposure to three CNS depressants (toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene) under resting and working conditions using PBPK modeling.
    Dennison JE; Bigelow PL; Mumtaz MM; Andersen ME; Dobrev ID; Yang RS
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Mar; 2(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 15764536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.