These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11217879)

  • 1. A method for turbulent noise estimation in voiced signals.
    Mitev P; Hadjitodorov S
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Nov; 38(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 11217879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A computer system for acoustic analysis of pathological voices and laryngeal diseases screening.
    Hadjitodorov S; Mitev P
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):419-29. PubMed ID: 12135650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection and combination of acoustic features for the description of pathologic voices.
    Michaelis D; Fröhlich M; Strube HW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Mar; 103(3):1628-39. PubMed ID: 9514027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation of a glottal related harmonics-to-noise ratio and spectral tilt as indicators of glottal noise in synthesized and human voice signals.
    Murphy PJ; McGuigan KG; Walsh M; Colreavy M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1642-52. PubMed ID: 18345852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quantitative analysis of pathological voice and identification with artificial neural network].
    Pang YF; Huang J; Xu BZ; Gong JR; Zou Y; He SZ
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jan; 31(2):100-102. PubMed ID: 29871196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of the glottal to noise excitation ratio for the screening of voice disorders.
    Godino-Llorente JI; Osma-Ruiz V; Sáenz-Lechón N; Gómez-Vilda P; Blanco-Velasco M; Cruz-Roldán F
    J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 19135854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new index for evaluation of the turbulent noise in pathological voice.
    Fukazawa T; el-Assuooty A; Honjo I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1189-93. PubMed ID: 3281987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Objective multi-parameters analysis of the voice dysphonia].
    Yu P; Wang G; Han B; Yang W; Han D
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 18(12):751-4. PubMed ID: 15831052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
    Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality.
    Eskenazi L; Childers DG; Hicks DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 2359270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The turbulent noise ratio: an estimation of noise power of the breathy voice using PARCOR analysis.
    Mori K; Blaugrund SM; Yu JD
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Feb; 104(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 8302117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual and acoustic assessment of voice pathology and the efficacy of endolaryngeal phonomicrosurgery.
    Uloza V; Saferis V; Uloziene I
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15766859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spectral noise estimation in the evaluation of pathological voice.
    Murphy PJ
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 17114131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the feasibility of smart phone microphone for measurement of acoustic voice parameters and voice pathology screening.
    Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Vegiene A; Pribuisiene R; Saferis V; Vaiciukynas E; Gelzinis A; Verikas A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3391-9. PubMed ID: 26162450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Harmonics-to-noise ratio estimation with deterministically time-varying harmonic model for pathological voice signals.
    Ikuma T; Story B; McWhorter AJ; Adkins L; Kunduk M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Sep; 152(3):1783. PubMed ID: 36182331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of pathological voices using glottal noise measures.
    Parsa V; Jamieson DG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Apr; 43(2):469-85. PubMed ID: 10757697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laryngeal perturbation analysis: minimum length of analysis window.
    Karnell MP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):544-8. PubMed ID: 2072678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximal Ambient Noise Levels and Type of Voice Material Required for Valid Use of Smartphones in Clinical Voice Research.
    Lebacq J; Schoentgen J; Cantarella G; Bruss FT; Manfredi C; DeJonckere P
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28320627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multidimensional Voice Data on Participants With Perceptually Normal Voices From Ages 60 to 80: A Preliminary Acoustic Reference for the Elderly Population.
    Schaeffer N; Knudsen M; Small A
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):631-7. PubMed ID: 25683920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.