These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11217931)

  • 1. Retinal thickness measurements with optical coherence tomography and the scanning retinal thickness analyzer.
    Konno S; Akiba J; Yoshida A
    Retina; 2001; 21(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 11217931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of foveal thickness measured with the retinal thickness analyzer and optical coherence tomography.
    Neubauer AS; Priglinger S; Ullrich S; Bechmann M; Thiel MJ; Ulbig MW; Kampik A
    Retina; 2001; 21(6):596-601. PubMed ID: 11756882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between retinal thickness analyzer and optical coherence tomography for assessment of foveal thickness in eyes with macular disease.
    Polito A; Shah SM; Haller JA; Zimmer-Galler I; Zeimer R; Campochiaro PA; Vitale S
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):240-51. PubMed ID: 12140031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Reproducibility of measurements of the peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness. Optical coherence tomography versus retinal thickness analyzer].
    Krist R; Hoffmann EM; Schwenn O
    Ophthalmologe; 2005 Dec; 102(12):1175-8, 1180. PubMed ID: 15871020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retinal thickness in diabetic retinopathy: comparison of optical coherence tomography, the retinal thickness analyzer, and fundus photography.
    Goebel W; Franke R
    Retina; 2006 Jan; 26(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 16395139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Precision and reliability of retinal thickness measurements in foveal and extrafoveal areas of healthy and diabetic eyes.
    Tangelder GJ; Van der Heijde RG; Polak BC; Ringens PJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2627-34. PubMed ID: 18515592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability of Foveal Measurements Using Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Segmentation Software.
    Ctori I; Huntjens B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129005. PubMed ID: 26076457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retinal thickness study with optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetes.
    Sánchez-Tocino H; Alvarez-Vidal A; Maldonado MJ; Moreno-Montañés J; García-Layana A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1588-94. PubMed ID: 11980878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of retinal and choroidal thickness measurements in enhanced depth imaging and high-penetration optical coherence tomography.
    Ikuno Y; Maruko I; Yasuno Y; Miura M; Sekiryu T; Nishida K; Iida T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(8):5536-40. PubMed ID: 21508114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of manually corrected retinal thickness measurements from multiple spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments.
    Heussen FM; Ouyang Y; McDonnell EC; Narala R; Ruiz-Garcia H; Walsh AC; Sadda SR
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 96(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 21733920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility and repeatability of foveal avascular zone measurements in healthy subjects by optical coherence tomography angiography.
    Carpineto P; Mastropasqua R; Marchini G; Toto L; Di Nicola M; Di Antonio L
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 100(5):671-6. PubMed ID: 26377414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability and reproducibility of eight macular intra-retinal layer thicknesses determined by an automated segmentation algorithm using two SD-OCT instruments.
    Liu X; Shen M; Huang S; Leng L; Zhu D; Lu F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87996. PubMed ID: 24505345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Posterior pole retinal thickness measurements by the retinal thickness analyzer in healthy Chinese subjects.
    Chan CM; Yu JH; Chen LJ; Huang CH; Lee CT; Lin TC; Liu DZ
    Retina; 2006 Feb; 26(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 16467674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of retinal mapping using optical coherence tomography.
    Massin P; Vicaut E; Haouchine B; Erginay A; Paques M; Gaudric A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2001 Aug; 119(8):1135-42. PubMed ID: 11483079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using spectralis optical coherence tomography.
    Menke MN; Dabov S; Knecht P; Sturm V
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 19026403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparability of retinal thickness measurements using different scanning protocols on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Chew MC; Lim LW; Tan E; Tan CS
    Int Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 36(6):791-797. PubMed ID: 26887565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eccentricity and measurement variability and repeatability with the retinal thickness analyser.
    Gilmore ED; Hudson C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 88(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 14693775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of retinal thickness in the macula region in a population of healthy subjects by using the retinal thickness analyzer RTA].
    Polaczek-Krupa B; Grabska-Liberek I
    Klin Oczna; 2009; 111(7-9):217-20. PubMed ID: 19899577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retinal thickness in diabetic retinopathy: a study using optical coherence tomography (OCT).
    Goebel W; Kretzchmar-Gross T
    Retina; 2002 Dec; 22(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 12476103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Macular thickness in patients with choroidal neovascularization determined by RTA and OCT3: comparative results.
    Montero JA; Ruiz-Moreno JM
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Jan; 19(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 15105818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.