These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11218228)

  • 1. Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.
    Shahan TA; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Nov; 74(3):311-30. PubMed ID: 11218228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice.
    Grossbard CL; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 May; 45(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 3711777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of unsignaled delays of reinforcement on fixed-interval schedule performance.
    Elcoro M; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 21801816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responding during reinforcement delay in a self-control paradigm.
    Logue AW; Peña-Correal TE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 May; 41(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 6736857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of the response-reinforcer relation in delay-of-reinforcement effects.
    Williams AM; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 10220929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of changeover delays on local choice.
    Gomes-Ng S; Landon J; Elliffe D; Bensemann J; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2018 May; 150():36-46. PubMed ID: 29499344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.
    Shull RL; Pliskoff SS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov; 10(6):517-27. PubMed ID: 6080829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Procrastination in the pigeon: Can conditioned reinforcement increase the likelihood of human procrastination?
    Zentall TR; Case JP; Andrews DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1952-1957. PubMed ID: 29188447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.
    Nevin JA; Randolph ; Holland S; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):43-74. PubMed ID: 11516115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioral momentum and accumulation of mass in multiple schedules.
    Craig AR; Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 May; 103(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 25787824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discriminative stimulus control and the effects of concurrent operants.
    Leigland S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Mar; 47(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 3572298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changeover delay effects on topographically tagged discriminative behavior.
    White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Mar; 37(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 7069362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.