These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11218228)

  • 21. Procrastination by pigeons with fixed-interval response requirements.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 9540230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 14964707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of a local negative feedback function between choice and relative reinforcer rate.
    Davison M; Elliffe D; Marr MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 21451748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Concurrent Schedules: Effects of Blackout during the Changeover Delay.
    Boelens H; Kop PF; Slangen JL
    Behav Processes; 1989; 18(1-3):87-97. PubMed ID: 24897668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
    Beeby E; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 11394485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modeling the dynamics of choice.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 19429211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reinforcing staying and switching while using a changeover delay.
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 12822688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of signaled-delayed reinforcement: effects of delay-signal duration.
    Schaal DW; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):103-21. PubMed ID: 2299283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.
    Preston RA; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):155-75. PubMed ID: 2037825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Unsignaled delay of reinforcement, relative time, and resistance to change.
    Shahan TA; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 May; 83(3):201-19. PubMed ID: 16047606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Changeover delay and concurrent-schedule performance in domestic hens.
    Temple W; Scown JM; Foster TM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Jan; 63(1):71-95. PubMed ID: 16812753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 8126393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.
    Lieving GA; Reilly MP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17002227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Choice among two and three alternatives.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 May; 107(3):369-387. PubMed ID: 28516673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.
    Yamaguchi T; Saeki D; Ito M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():8-12. PubMed ID: 26456039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tests of transitivity in choices between fixed and variable reinforcer delays.
    Mazur JE; Coe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 May; 47(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 3612019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.