These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11219886)
1. The effects of patients' and practitioners' preferences on randomized clinical trials. King M Palliat Med; 2000 Nov; 14(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 11219886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Epilepsy monitoring and advice recorded: general practitioners' views, current practice and patients' preferences. Ridsdale L; Robins D; Fitzgerald A; Jeffery S; McGee L Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Jan; 46(402):11-4. PubMed ID: 8745845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of treatment preferences on validity: a review. Sidani S; Miranda J; Epstein D; Fox M Can J Nurs Res; 2009 Dec; 41(4):52-67. PubMed ID: 20191713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The compliance score as a regressor in randomized trials. Joffe MM; Ten Have TR; Brensinger C Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):327-40. PubMed ID: 12925501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The return of "negative" trials? de Lemos ML CMAJ; 2003 May; 168(11):1392-3; author reply 1393-4. PubMed ID: 12771062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Conducting randomised controlled trials in primary care: lessons from an obesity management trial. Nelson P; Adamson A; Moore H Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Sep; 56(530):674-9. PubMed ID: 16953999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complementary health practitioners' attitudes, practices and knowledge related to women's cancers. Gray RE; Fitch M; Saunders PR; Wilkinson A; Ross CP; Franssen E; Caverhill K Cancer Prev Control; 1999 Feb; 3(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 10474756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A critical approach to evidence provided through clinical trials. Shaw S Nurs Times; 2006 Sep 5-11; 102(36):36-8. PubMed ID: 16986593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Introduction to randomized trials: attrition bias]. Simon EG; Fouché CJ; Perrotin F Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Jan; 40(1):64-5. PubMed ID: 22192692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological limitations prevent definitive conclusions on the effects of patients' preferences in randomized clinical trials evaluating musculoskeletal conditions. Franco MR; Ferreira ML; Ferreira PH; Maher CG; Pinto RZ; Cherkin DC J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 66(6):586-98. PubMed ID: 23510556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: 1. Failure to gain "coal-face" commitment and to use the uncertainty principle. Sackett DL CMAJ; 2000 May; 162(9):1311-4. PubMed ID: 10813014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]