These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11219960)

  • 1. Learning artificial grammars: no evidence for the acquisition of rules.
    Kinder A; Assmann A
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Dec; 28(8):1321-32. PubMed ID: 11219960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrence of rule- and similarity-based mechanisms in artificial grammar learning.
    Opitz B; Hofmann J
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Mar; 77():77-99. PubMed ID: 25767052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of prior knowledge in implicit and explicit learning of artificial grammars.
    Ziori E; Pothos EM; Dienes Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Aug; 28():1-16. PubMed ID: 24999179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning.
    van den Bos E; Poletiek FH
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1122-31. PubMed ID: 18927030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Connectionist models of artificial grammar learning: what type of knowledge is acquired?
    Kinder A; Lotz A
    Psychol Res; 2009 Sep; 73(5):659-73. PubMed ID: 18998163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Input and Age-Dependent Variation in Second Language Learning: A Connectionist Account.
    Janciauskas M; Chang F
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):519-554. PubMed ID: 28744901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implicit learning and reading: insights from typical children and children with developmental dyslexia using the artificial grammar learning (AGL) paradigm.
    Pavlidou EV; Williams JM
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1457-72. PubMed ID: 24751907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rule and similarity in grammar: their interplay and individual differences in the brain.
    Hauser MF; Hofmann J; Opitz B
    Neuroimage; 2012 May; 60(4):2019-26. PubMed ID: 22369994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theories of artificial grammar learning.
    Pothos EM
    Psychol Bull; 2007 Mar; 133(2):227-44. PubMed ID: 17338598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The conscious, the unconscious, and familiarity.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1264-88. PubMed ID: 18763904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AGSuite: Software to conduct feature analysis of artificial grammar learning performance.
    Cook MT; Chubala CM; Jamieson RK
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1639-1651. PubMed ID: 28597235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning.
    Pothos EM; Bailey TM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):847-62. PubMed ID: 10946367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification and recognition in artificial grammar learning: Analysis of receiver operating characteristics.
    Lotz A; Kinder A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):667-82. PubMed ID: 16707356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Role of Simple Semantics in the Process of Artificial Grammar Learning.
    Öttl B; Jäger G; Kaup B
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1285-1308. PubMed ID: 28484966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain correlates of language learning: the neuronal dissociation of rule-based versus similarity-based learning.
    Opitz B; Friederici AD
    J Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 24(39):8436-40. PubMed ID: 15456816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial grammar learning in primary school children with and without developmental dyslexia.
    Pavlidou EV; Williams JM; Kelly LM
    Ann Dyslexia; 2009 Jun; 59(1):55-77. PubMed ID: 19326218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Similarity and confidence in artificial grammar learning.
    Tunney RJ
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 20178925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: a preference for grammaticality.
    Forkstam C; Elwér A; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1221():80-92. PubMed ID: 18561897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociations of grammaticality and specific similarity effects in artificial grammar learning.
    Higham PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Jul; 23(4):1029-45. PubMed ID: 9231440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modes of knowledge acquisition and retrieval in artificial grammar learning.
    Poznanski Y; Tzelgov J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1495-515. PubMed ID: 20063258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.