These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11220208)

  • 1. Hearing by eye: how much spatial degradation can be tolerated?
    MacDonald J; Andersen S; Bachmann T
    Perception; 2000; 29(10):1155-68. PubMed ID: 11220208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of the auditory-visual illusion in speech perception by children with phonological disorders.
    Dodd B; McIntosh B; Erdener D; Burnham D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Jan; 22(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 18092221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of selective attention to auditory and visual speech on the integration of audiovisual speech information.
    Buchan JN; Munhall KG
    Perception; 2011; 40(10):1164-82. PubMed ID: 22308887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When eyes beat lips: speaker gaze affects audiovisual integration in the McGurk illusion.
    Wahn B; Schmitz L; Kingstone A; Böckler-Raettig A
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1930-1943. PubMed ID: 34854983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study.
    Eskelund K; MacDonald EN; Andersen TS
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Read my lips: asymmetries in the visual expression and perception of speech revealed through the McGurk effect.
    Nicholls ME; Searle DA; Bradshaw JL
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Feb; 15(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 14738522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L; Macaluso E; Soto-Faraco S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5691-5705. PubMed ID: 28792094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the McGurk effect for spoken and sung syllables.
    Quinto L; Thompson WF; Russo FA; Trehub SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20675792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neuropsychological studies of auditory-visual fusion illusions. Four case studies and their implications.
    Campbell R; Garwood J; Franklin S; Howard D; Landis T; Regard M
    Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(8):787-802. PubMed ID: 1701035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.
    Gurler D; Doyle N; Walker E; Magnotti J; Beauchamp M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1333-41. PubMed ID: 25810157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?
    Brown VA; Hedayati M; Zanger A; Mayn S; Ray L; Dillman-Hasso N; Strand JF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207160. PubMed ID: 30418995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading.
    Driver J
    Nature; 1996 May; 381(6577):66-8. PubMed ID: 8609989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rethinking the McGurk effect as a perceptual illusion.
    Getz LM; Toscano JC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2583-2598. PubMed ID: 33884572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory and visual cueing of the [+/- rounded] feature of vowels.
    Lisker L; Rossi M
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 4)():391-417. PubMed ID: 1339920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of intersensory synchrony in audiovisual speech: not that special.
    Vroomen J; Stekelenburg JJ
    Cognition; 2011 Jan; 118(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 21035795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers MS; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):656-68. PubMed ID: 17804980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech and non-speech audio-visual illusions: a developmental study.
    Tremblay C; Champoux F; Voss P; Bacon BA; Lepore F; Théoret H
    PLoS One; 2007 Aug; 2(1):e742. PubMed ID: 17710142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do you see what you are hearing? Cross-modal effects of speech sounds on lipreading.
    Baart M; Vroomen J
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Mar; 471(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 20080146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual abilities are important for auditory-only speech recognition: evidence from autism spectrum disorder.
    Schelinski S; Riedel P; von Kriegstein K
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():1-11. PubMed ID: 25283605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.