These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11223705)

  • 1. Intrapartum prediction of macrosomia: accuracy of abdominal circumference estimation.
    Al-Inany H; Alaa N; Momtaz M; Abdel Badii M
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2001; 51(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 11223705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrapartum fetal abdominal circumference by ultrasonography for predicting fetal macrosomia.
    Loetworawanit R; Chittacharoen A; Sututvoravut S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89 Suppl 4():S60-4. PubMed ID: 17726811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting fetal macrosomia with abdominal circumference alone.
    Henrichs C; Magann EF; Brantley KL; Crews JH; Sanderson M; Chauhan SP
    J Reprod Med; 2003 May; 48(5):339-42. PubMed ID: 12815906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
    Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal biacromial diameter as a new ultrasound measure for prediction of macrosomia in term pregnancy: a prospective observational study.
    Youssef AEA; Amin AF; Khalaf M; Khalaf MS; Ali MK; Abbas AM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(16):2674-2679. PubMed ID: 29478363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Prevention of shoulder dystocia by an ultrasound selection at the beginning of labour of foetuses with large abdominal circumference].
    Maticot-Baptista D; Collin A; Martin A; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Feb; 36(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 17293252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of fetal macrosomia: effect of sonographic fetal weight-estimation model and threshold used.
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Pardo J; Ben-Haroush A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21229567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in South Tunisia.
    Chaabane K; Trigui K; Louati D; Kebaili S; Gassara H; Dammak A; Amouri H; Guermazi M
    Pan Afr Med J; 2013; 14():111. PubMed ID: 23717725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
    Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
    J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review.
    Coomarasamy A; Connock M; Thornton J; Khan KS
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1461-6. PubMed ID: 16225563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting neonatal weight of more than 4000 g using fetal abdominal circumference measurement by ultrasound at 38-40 weeks of pregnancy: a study in Iran.
    Dadkhah F; Kashanian M; Bonyad Z; Larijani T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 22690747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia. A risk factor for shoulder dystocia.
    Gilby JR; Williams MC; Spellacy WN
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):936-8. PubMed ID: 11127108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Macrosomia prediction using ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference of 35 centimeters or more.
    Jazayeri A; Heffron JA; Phillips R; Spellacy WN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 93(4):523-6. PubMed ID: 10214826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of fetal macrosomia by single ultrasonic fetal biometry.
    Chen CP; Chang FM; Chang CH; Lin YS; Chou CY; Ko HC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 Jan; 92(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 8099822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes: finding the best formula.
    Shmueli A; Salman L; Hadar E; Aviram A; Bardin R; Ashwal E; Gabbay-Benziv R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30327863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrapartum fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio: an ultrasonographic clue to fetal macrosomia.
    Santolaya-Forgas J; Meyer WJ; Gauthier DW; Kahn D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1072-5. PubMed ID: 7943073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
    De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosis of macrosomia in the postdates population: combining sonographic estimates of fetal weight with glucose challenge testing.
    Sylvestre G; Divon MY; Onyeije C; Fisher M
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(5):287-90. PubMed ID: 11132584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia cannot be improved by combination with pregnancy-specific characteristics.
    Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Burkhardt T; Wisser J; Kurmanavicius J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 19266500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.