397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11223761)
1. Awareness and use of the Ottawa ankle and knee rules in 5 countries: can publication alone be enough to change practice?
Graham ID; Stiell IG; Laupacis A; McAuley L; Howell M; Clancy M; Durieux P; Simon N; Emparanza JI; Aginaga JR; O'connor A; Wells G
Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Mar; 37(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 11223761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International survey of emergency physicians' awareness and use of the Canadian Cervical-Spine Rule and the Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule.
Eagles D; Stiell IG; Clement CM; Brehaut J; Taljaard M; Kelly AM; Mason S; Kellermann A; Perry JJ
Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1256-61. PubMed ID: 18945241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Emergency physicians' attitudes toward and use of clinical decision rules for radiography.
Graham ID; Stiell IG; Laupacis A; O'Connor AM; Wells GA
Acad Emerg Med; 1998 Feb; 5(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 9492134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pediatric emergency physician opinions on ankle radiograph clinical decision rules.
Boutis K; Constantine E; Schuh S; Pecaric M; Stephens D; Narayanan UG
Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Jul; 17(7):709-17. PubMed ID: 20653584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children: a survey of physicians' practice patterns.
Dowling SK; Wishart I
CJEM; 2011 Sep; 13(5):333-8; E44-6. PubMed ID: 21955415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.
Glas AS; Pijnenburg BA; Lijmer JG; Bogaard K; de RM; Keeman JN; Butzelaar RM; Bossuyt PM
CMAJ; 2002 Mar; 166(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 11944759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of clinical decision rules on clinical care of traumatic injuries to the foot and ankle, knee, cervical spine, and head.
Perry JJ; Stiell IG
Injury; 2006 Dec; 37(12):1157-65. PubMed ID: 17078955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of implementation strategies for increasing clinicians' use of five validated imaging decision rules for musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review.
Kharel P; Zadro JR; Wong G; Rojanabenjawong K; Traeger A; Linklater J; Maher CG
BMC Emerg Med; 2024 May; 24(1):84. PubMed ID: 38760697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical decision rules "in the real world": how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice.
Brehaut JC; Stiell IG; Visentin L; Graham ID
Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 12(10):948-56. PubMed ID: 16166599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acceptability of a Mobile Clinical Decision Tool Among Emergency Department Clinicians: Development and Evaluation of The Ottawa Rules App.
Paradis M; Stiell I; Atkinson KM; Guerinet J; Sequeira Y; Salter L; Forster AJ; Murphy MS; Wilson K
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Jun; 6(6):e10263. PubMed ID: 29891469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules.
Stiell IG; McKnight RD; Greenberg GH; McDowell I; Nair RC; Wells GA; Johns C; Worthington JR
JAMA; 1994 Mar; 271(11):827-32. PubMed ID: 8114236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France: a study in the surgical emergency department of a teaching hospital.
Auleley GR; Kerboull L; Durieux P; Cosquer M; Courpied JP; Ravaud P
Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Jul; 32(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 9656943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
Anis AH; Stiell IG; Stewart DG; Laupacis A
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Oct; 26(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 7574122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring acceptability of clinical decision rules: validation of the Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI) in four countries.
Brehaut JC; Graham ID; Wood TJ; Taljaard M; Eagles D; Lott A; Clement C; Kelly AM; Mason S; Stiell IG
Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(3):398-408. PubMed ID: 20042533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Emergency physicians' knowledge and attitudes of clinical decision support in the electronic health record: a survey-based study.
Ballard DW; Rauchwerger AS; Reed ME; Vinson DR; Mark DG; Offerman SR; Chettipally UK; Graetz I; Dayan P; Kuppermann N;
Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 20(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 23701342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France. A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Auleley GR; Ravaud P; Giraudeau B; Kerboull L; Nizard R; Massin P; Garreau de Loubresse C; Vallée C; Durieux P
JAMA; 1997 Jun; 277(24):1935-9. PubMed ID: 9200633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No impact from active dissemination of the Ottawa Ankle Rules: further evidence of the need for local implementation of practice guidelines.
Cameron C; Naylor CD
CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1165-8. PubMed ID: 10234347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.
Stiell I; Wells G; Laupacis A; Brison R; Verbeek R; Vandemheen K; Naylor CD
BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7005):594-7. PubMed ID: 7663253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Awareness and use of five imaging decision rules for musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review.
Kharel P; Zadro JR; Chen Z; Himbury MA; Traeger AC; Linklater J; Maher CG
Int J Emerg Med; 2023 Nov; 16(1):85. PubMed ID: 37957570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation of the Ottawa Knee Rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries.
Stiell IG; Wells GA; Hoag RH; Sivilotti ML; Cacciotti TF; Verbeek PR; Greenway KT; McDowell I; Cwinn AA; Greenberg GH; Nichol G; Michael JA
JAMA; 1997 Dec; 278(23):2075-9. PubMed ID: 9403421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
