These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11224873)
1. Quantitative changes in spinal canal dimensions using interbody distraction for spondylolisthesis. Vamvanij V; Ferrara LA; Hai Y; Zhao J; Kolata R; Yuan HA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Feb; 26(3):E13-8. PubMed ID: 11224873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term results of pediculo-body fixation and posterolateral fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Zagra A; Giudici F; Minoia L; Corriero AS; Zagra L Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):151-5. PubMed ID: 19444490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing neuroforaminal volume by anterior interbody distraction in degenerative lumbar spine. Chen D; Fay LA; Lok J; Yuan P; Edwards WT; Yuan HA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jan; 20(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 7709283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine. Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ideal amount of lumbar foraminal distraction for pedicle screw instrumentation. Infusa A; An HS; Glover JM; McGrady L; Lim TH; Riley LH Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Oct; 21(19):2218-23. PubMed ID: 8902965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cadaveric radiographic analysis on the effect of extreme lateral interbody fusion cage placement with supplementary internal fixation on indirect spine decompression. Marulanda GA; Nayak A; Murtagh R; Santoni BG; Billys JB; Castellvi AE J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jul; 27(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 23563336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of radiographic disc height changes using two different interbody devices for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: open box vs. fenestrated tube interbody cage. Matsumura A; Taneichi H; Suda K; Kajino T; Moridaira H; Kaneda K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):E871-6. PubMed ID: 17077723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model. Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Kim JS; Kang BU; Lee SH; Jung B; Choi YG; Jeon SH; Lee HY J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 19342933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Oliveira L; Marchi L; Coutinho E; Pimenta L Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Dec; 35(26 Suppl):S331-7. PubMed ID: 21160397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]