These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11226239)

  • 1. Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function.
    Pillardy J; Czaplewski C; Liwo A; Lee J; Ripoll DR; Kaźmierkiewicz R; Oldziej S; Wedemeyer WJ; Gibson KD; Arnautova YA; Saunders J; Ye YJ; Scheraga HA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Feb; 98(5):2329-33. PubMed ID: 11226239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physics-based protein-structure prediction using a hierarchical protocol based on the UNRES force field: assessment in two blind tests.
    Ołdziej S; Czaplewski C; Liwo A; Chinchio M; Nanias M; Vila JA; Khalili M; Arnautova YA; Jagielska A; Makowski M; Schafroth HD; Kaźmierkiewicz R; Ripoll DR; Pillardy J; Saunders JA; Kang YK; Gibson KD; Scheraga HA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 May; 102(21):7547-52. PubMed ID: 15894609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploratory studies of ab initio protein structure prediction: multiple copy simulated annealing, AMBER energy functions, and a generalized born/solvent accessibility solvation model.
    Liu Y; Beveridge DL
    Proteins; 2002 Jan; 46(1):128-46. PubMed ID: 11746709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.
    Zhang Y; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Biophys J; 2003 Aug; 85(2):1145-64. PubMed ID: 12885659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Error-estimation-guided rebuilding of de novo models increases the success rate of ab initio phasing.
    Shrestha R; Simoncini D; Zhang KY
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2012 Nov; 68(Pt 11):1522-34. PubMed ID: 23090401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PDB-based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization.
    van Vlijmen HW; Karplus M
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Apr; 267(4):975-1001. PubMed ID: 9135125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of statistical potentials to protein structure refinement from low resolution ab initio models.
    Lu H; Skolnick J
    Biopolymers; 2003 Dec; 70(4):575-84. PubMed ID: 14648767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calculation of protein conformation by global optimization of a potential energy function.
    Lee J; Liwo A; Ripoll DR; Pillardy J; Scheraga HA
    Proteins; 1999; Suppl 3():204-8. PubMed ID: 10526370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benchmarking of TASSER in the ab initio limit.
    Borreguero JM; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17444524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Maximum-Likelihood Approach to Force-Field Calibration.
    Zaborowski B; Jagieła D; Czaplewski C; Hałabis A; Lewandowska A; Żmudzińska W; Ołdziej S; Karczyńska A; Omieczynski C; Wirecki T; Liwo A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Sep; 55(9):2050-70. PubMed ID: 26263302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protein structure prediction based on fragment assembly and parameter optimization.
    Lee J; Kim SY; Lee J
    Biophys Chem; 2005 Apr; 115(2-3):209-14. PubMed ID: 15752606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ab initio structure prediction of two alpha-helical oligomers with a multiple-chain united-residue force field and global search.
    Saunders JA; Scheraga HA
    Biopolymers; 2003 Mar; 68(3):300-17. PubMed ID: 12601791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving fragment quality for de novo structure prediction.
    Shrestha R; Zhang KY
    Proteins; 2014 Sep; 82(9):2240-52. PubMed ID: 24753351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. De novo protein structure prediction by dynamic fragment assembly and conformational space annealing.
    Lee J; Lee J; Sasaki TN; Sasai M; Seok C; Lee J
    Proteins; 2011 Aug; 79(8):2403-17. PubMed ID: 21604307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ab initio modeling of small, medium, and large loops in proteins.
    Galaktionov S; Nikiforovich GV; Marshall GR
    Biopolymers; 2001; 60(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 11455548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ab initio prediction of the three-dimensional structure of a de novo designed protein: a double-blind case study.
    Klepeis JL; Wei Y; Hecht MH; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):560-70. PubMed ID: 15609306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of protein structure by simulating coarse-grained folding pathways: a preliminary report.
    Colubri A
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2004 Apr; 21(5):625-38. PubMed ID: 14769055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of protein loop conformations using multiscale modeling methods with physical energy scoring functions.
    Olson MA; Feig M; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Apr; 29(5):820-31. PubMed ID: 17876760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Necessary conditions for avoiding incorrect polypeptide folds in conformational search by energy minimization.
    Vajda S; Jafri MS; Sezerman OU; DeLisi C
    Biopolymers; 1993 Jan; 33(1):173-92. PubMed ID: 8427934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multibody, whole-residue potential for protein structures, with testing by Monte Carlo simulated annealing.
    Mayewski S
    Proteins; 2005 May; 59(2):152-69. PubMed ID: 15723360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.