These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1122664)

  • 21. [Normal value, predictive value and panic value. Functional analysis of laboratory tests (author's transl)].
    Okamura K
    Rinsho Byori; 1980; 28(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 6248667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Precision of sensitivity estimations in diagnostic test evaluations. Power functions for comparisons of sensitivities of two tests.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem; 1985 Apr; 31(4):574-80. PubMed ID: 3978790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality assessment of smear microscopy by stratified lot sampling of treatment follow-up slides.
    Otero L; Van Deun A; Agapito J; Ugaz R; Prellwitz G; Gotuzzo E; Van der Stuyft P
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2011 Feb; 15(2):211-6, i. PubMed ID: 21219683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Echography for palpable breast tumors].
    Zonderland HM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Nov; 137(46):2349-50. PubMed ID: 8264816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests].
    Marchi F
    G Ital Cardiol; 1981; 11(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 7286506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [CME--Laboratory 15/ Solution].
    Eckardstein A
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2010 Mar; 99(5):325-7. PubMed ID: 20205094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Statistics for nuclear medicine. Part 6: Normal values, evaluating a new diagnostic procedure, sequential methods, and conclusion.
    O'Brien PC; Shampo MA; Robertson JS
    J Nucl Med; 1983 Jun; 24(6):535-41. PubMed ID: 6854403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistics for diagnostic procedures. II. The significance of "no significance": what a negative statistical test really means.
    Phillips WC; Scott JA; Blasczcynski G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jul; 141(1):203-6. PubMed ID: 6602519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risk factors for false positive and for false negative test results in screening with fecal occult blood testing.
    Stegeman I; de Wijkerslooth TR; Stoop EM; van Leerdam M; van Ballegooijen M; Kraaijenhagen RA; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Bossuyt PM
    Int J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 133(10):2408-14. PubMed ID: 23649826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast masses in Benin City, Nigeria.
    Obaseki DE; Olu-Eddo AN; Ogunbiyi JO
    West Afr J Med; 2010; 29(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 20931514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of diagnostic tests].
    Toman K
    Bull Int Union Tuberc; 1981; 56(1-2):19-30. PubMed ID: 7296087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Evaluation of diagnostic possibility of clinical tests].
    Rinsho Byori; 2000 Aug; Suppl 113():34-50. PubMed ID: 11103142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual estimate of body temperature in neonates.
    Hall RT; Oliver TK
    JAMA; 1971 Dec; 218(11):1700-2. PubMed ID: 5171050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Components of quality control.
    Hurley AA
    Curr Protoc Cytom; 2001 May; Chapter 3():Unit 3.2. PubMed ID: 18770705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests].
    Smets P
    Rev Med Brux; 1985 Sep; 6(7):451-4. PubMed ID: 4081407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Statistical models in screening tests (author's transl)].
    Drdková S
    Sb Lek; 1974 Oct; 76(10):283-8. PubMed ID: 4424748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validity of statistical techniques in assessing conclusions drawn from serologic tests.
    Case J
    Transfusion; 1997 Aug; 37(8):773-4. PubMed ID: 9280319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of diagnostic tests].
    Rümke CL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1983 Mar; 127(13):556-61. PubMed ID: 6843704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing proportions in the presence of false positive and false negative instrument sorting errors.
    Lakshmi DV; Smith WK
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):639-41. PubMed ID: 8369396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Roaming through methodology. XXXII. False test results].
    van der Weijden T; van den Akker M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 May; 145(19):906-8. PubMed ID: 11387865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.