These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11226922)

  • 1. [Phone prompt or mailed reminder for increasing response rate among investigators? A randomized trial in the Sentinelles network].
    Czernichow S; Flahault A
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2001 Feb; 49(1):93-4. PubMed ID: 11226922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of follow-up contact for a postal survey: a randomised controlled trial.
    Breen CL; Shakeshaft AP; Doran CM; Sanson-Fisher RW; Mattick RP
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2010 Oct; 34(5):508-12. PubMed ID: 21040180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparability of skin screening histories obtained by telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires: a randomized crossover study.
    Aitken JF; Youl PH; Janda M; Elwood M; Ring IT; Lowe JB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 160(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 15353421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized trial of the impact of telephone and recorded delivery reminders on the response rate to research questionnaires.
    Tai SS; Nazareth I; Haines A; Jowett C
    J Public Health Med; 1997 Jun; 19(2):219-21. PubMed ID: 9243440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.
    Hocking JS; Lim MS; Read T; Hellard M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 May; 59(5):521-4. PubMed ID: 16632141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving completion of advance directives in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial.
    Heiman H; Bates DW; Fairchild D; Shaykevich S; Lehmann LS
    Am J Med; 2004 Sep; 117(5):318-24. PubMed ID: 15336581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of advance telephone prompting in a survey of general dental practitioners in scotland: a randomised controlled trial.
    Ho-A-Yun J; Crawford F; Newton J; Clarkson J
    Community Dent Health; 2007 Dec; 24(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 18246841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Telephone reminder calls increased response rates to mailed study consent forms.
    Traina SB; MacLean CH; Park GS; Kahn KL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):743-6. PubMed ID: 15939228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design and acceptability of patient-oriented computerized diabetes care reminders for use at the point of care.
    Sciamanna CN; Gifford DR; Smith RJ
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2004 Jun; 29(2):157-68. PubMed ID: 15370995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prepayment was superior to postpayment cash incentives in a randomized postal survey among physicians.
    Leung GM; Johnston JM; Saing H; Tin KY; Wong IO; Ho LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 57(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 15485729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What works. Telephone reminder system works with patient software to reduce no-show rate.
    Stickney P
    Health Manag Technol; 1997 May; 18(6):46. PubMed ID: 10167520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Money talks: non-monetary incentive and Internet administration fail to increase response rates to a physician survey.
    Recklitis CJ; Campbell EG; Kutner JS; Bober SL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):224-6. PubMed ID: 19131016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Participation and successful patient recruitment in primary care.
    de Wit NJ; Quartero AO; Zuithoff AP; Numans ME
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Nov; 50(11):976. PubMed ID: 11711015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates.
    Robertson J; Walkom EJ; McGettigan P
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Aug; 14(8):571-7. PubMed ID: 15937989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate.
    Jepson C; Asch DA; Hershey JC; Ubel PA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jan; 58(1):103-5. PubMed ID: 15649678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An introductory letter in advance of a telephone survey may increase response rate.
    Majowicz SE; Edge VL; Flint J; Sockett P; Doré K; McDougall L; Remple V; Fyfe M; Henson S; Gaebel K
    Can Commun Dis Rep; 2004 Jul; 30(13):121-3. PubMed ID: 15248524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated telephone reminder messages can assist electronic diabetes care.
    Mollon B; Holbrook AM; Keshavjee K; Troyan S; Gaebel K; Thabane L; Perera G
    J Telemed Telecare; 2008; 14(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 18318927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Triggering anti-smoking advice by GPs: mode of action of an intervention stimulating smoking cessation advice by GPs.
    McEwen A; West R; Preston A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jul; 62(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 16023821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chapter V. A comparison of CATI and non-CATI questionnaires.
    Groves RM; Mathiowetz NA
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):33-9. PubMed ID: 15791754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.