These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11227538)

  • 1. Modified on-line monitoring of total gaseous mercury in flue gases using Semtech Hg 2000 analyzer.
    Feng X; Sommar J; Abul-Milh M; Hong B; Strömberg D; Lindqvist O
    Fresenius J Anal Chem; 2000 Nov; 368(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 11227538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gas-phase mercury reduction to measure total mercury in the flue gas of a coal-fired boiler.
    Meischen SJ; Van Pelt VJ; Zarate EA; Stephens EA
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Jan; 54(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 14871013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speciation, behaviour, and fate of mercury under oxy-fuel combustion conditions.
    Córdoba P; Maroto-Valer M; Delgado MA; Diego R; Font O; Querol X
    Environ Res; 2016 Feb; 145():154-161. PubMed ID: 26697809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gas-phase elemental mercury removal in a simulated combustion flue gas using TiO2 with fluorescent light.
    Cho JH; Lee TG; Eom Y
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Oct; 62(10):1208-13. PubMed ID: 23155867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Issues related to solution chemistry in mercury sampling impingers.
    Linak WP; Ryan JV; Ghorishi BS; Wendt JO
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 May; 51(5):688-98. PubMed ID: 11355456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using bromine gas to enhance mercury removal from flue gas of coal-fired power plants.
    Liu SH; Yan NQ; Liu ZR; Qu Z; Wang HP; Chang SG; Miller C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(4):1405-12. PubMed ID: 17593749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fate and behavior of mercury in coal-fired power plants.
    Meij R; Vredenbregt LH; te Winkel H
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 Aug; 52(8):912-7. PubMed ID: 12184689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel Counteraction Effect of H
    Wang C; Xie F; Chang S; Ding Z; Mei J; Yang S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jan; 56(1):642-651. PubMed ID: 34902247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal of mercury (II), elemental mercury and arsenic from simulated flue gas by ammonium sulphide.
    Ning P; Guo X; Wang X; Wang P; Ma Y; Lan Y
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(21):2691-701. PubMed ID: 25965547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Possibilities of mercury removal in the dry flue gas cleaning lines of solid waste incineration units.
    Svoboda K; Hartman M; Šyc M; Pohořelý M; Kameníková P; Jeremiáš M; Durda T
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():499-511. PubMed ID: 26588812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulation and evaluation of elemental mercury concentration increase in flue gas across a wet scrubber.
    Chang JC; Ghorishi SB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Dec; 37(24):5763-6. PubMed ID: 14717192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of selective catalytic reduction impact on mercury speciation under simulated NOx emission control conditions.
    Lee CW; Srivastava RK; Ghorishi SB; Hastings TW; Stevens FM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Dec; 54(12):1560-6. PubMed ID: 15648394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transport and transformation of mercury during wet flue gas cleaning process of nonferrous metal smelting.
    Liu Z; Wang D; Peng B; Chai L; Liu H; Yang S; Yang B; Xiang K; Liu C
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Oct; 24(28):22494-22502. PubMed ID: 28803273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-efficient adsorption and removal of elemental mercury from smelting flue gas by cobalt sulfide.
    Liu H; You Z; Yang S; Liu C; Xie X; Xiang K; Wang X; Yan X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(7):6735-6744. PubMed ID: 30632039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Purification of Hg
    Xing Y; Yan B; Lu P; Cui X; Li L; Wang M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Dec; 24(34):26310-26323. PubMed ID: 29063396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory evaluation of a mercury CEM using atomic absorption with a deuterium background correction system.
    Norton GA; Eckels DE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Apr; 36(8):1767-73. PubMed ID: 11993876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different Design Strategies for Metal Sulfide Sorbents to Capture Low Concentrations of Gaseous Hg
    Wang C; Mei J; Hong Q; Xie F; Ding Z; Ma C; Yang S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(10):7094-7101. PubMed ID: 33955737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SO
    Xu H; Hong Q; Zhang ZY; Cai X; Fan Y; Liu Z; Huang W; Yan N; Qu Z; Zhang L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Apr; 57(13):5424-5432. PubMed ID: 36939455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mercury speciation and distribution in a 660-megawatt utility boiler in Taiwan firing bituminous coals.
    Hsi HC; Lee HH; Hwang JF; Chen W
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 May; 60(5):514-22. PubMed ID: 20480850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Active methods of mercury removal from flue gases.
    Marczak M; Budzyń S; Szczurowski J; Kogut K; Burmistrz P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(9):8383-8392. PubMed ID: 29572741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.