These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1122763)

  • 21. Omissions in radiology: faulty search or stringent reporting criteria?
    Swensson RG; Hessel SJ; Herman PG
    Radiology; 1977 Jun; 123(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 870932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Receiver operating curve, an aid in decision making. Principles and applications illustrated with some examples].
    Vinatier D; Monnier JC
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1988; 17(8):981-9. PubMed ID: 3069898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists.
    Park SH; Goo JM; Jo CH
    Korean J Radiol; 2004; 5(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 15064554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of contrast radiology in small-bowel obstruction.
    Vipond MN; Williams RJ
    Surgery; 1991 Mar; 109(3 Pt 1):346-7. PubMed ID: 2000569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Confidence bands for receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Ma G; Hall WJ
    Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 8412547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can you handle the truth (and know it when you see it)? Understanding sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and ROC curves.
    Cotter K; Peipert JF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 16213422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The value of serum Cyfra21-1 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Cui C; Sun X; Zhang J; Han D; Gu J
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2014 Nov; 10 Suppl():C131-4. PubMed ID: 25450270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quasi-continuous and discrete confidence rating scales for observer performance studies: Effects on ROC analysis.
    Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 17178364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation.
    Swensson RG; King JL; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1597-609. PubMed ID: 11548929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Diagnosis of bone metastases from breast carcinoma: comparison of the clinical aspect, radiology and nuclear medicine].
    Meneghello A; Poli I; Casara D
    Radiol Med; 1981 Apr; 67(4):260-1. PubMed ID: 7313163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The area under an ROC curve with limited information.
    van den Hout WB
    Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 12693878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques in the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Jones CM; Athanasiou T
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jan; 79(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 15620907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and lipid peroxidation.
    Schisterman EF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2002; 196():343-52. PubMed ID: 12152214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 350 kV chest radiography has no diagnostic advantage: a comparison with 140 kV technique.
    Herman PG; Drummey J; Swensson RG; Hessel SJ; Balikian JP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Mar; 138(3):485-9. PubMed ID: 6977997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Statistical analysis with receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Mann FA; Hildebolt CF; Wilson AJ
    Radiology; 1992 Jul; 184(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 1609099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Search and nonsearch protocols for radiographic consultation.
    Swensson RG; Theodore GH
    Radiology; 1990 Dec; 177(3):851-6. PubMed ID: 2244000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A meta-analytic method for summarizing diagnostic test performances: receiver-operating-characteristic-summary point estimates.
    Midgette AS; Stukel TA; Littenberg B
    Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8412556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved detection of small lung cancers with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
    Li F; Engelmann R; Doi K; MacMahon H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):886-91. PubMed ID: 18356433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Balancing false positives and false negatives for the detection of differential expression in malignancies.
    De Smet F; Moreau Y; Engelen K; Timmerman D; Vergote I; De Moor B
    Br J Cancer; 2004 Sep; 91(6):1160-5. PubMed ID: 15354216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Schlossman D; Börjesson J; Håkansson E; Mattsson S; Tylén U
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.