73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11227776)
1. Electrical impedance scanning: a new technique in the diagnosis of lymph nodes in which malignancy is suspected on ultrasound.
Malich A; Fritsch T; Mauch C; Boehm T; Freesmeyer M; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Br J Radiol; 2001 Jan; 74(877):42-7. PubMed ID: 11227776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrical impedance scanning of lymph nodes: initial clinical and technical findings.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer M; Azhari T; Werner B; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Clin Radiol; 2002 Jul; 57(7):579-86. PubMed ID: 12096855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of sonographically suspicious and highly suspicious lymph nodes of the head-neck region.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Mentzel HJ; Fleck M; Boettcher J; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Eur Radiol; 2002 May; 12(5):1114-20. PubMed ID: 11976855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrical impedance scanning-application of this new technique for lymph node evaluation in children.
Mentzel HJ; Malich A; Kentouche K; Freesmeyer M; Böttcher J; Schneider G; Gruhn B; Vogt S; Zintl F; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Pediatr Radiol; 2003 Jul; 33(7):461-6. PubMed ID: 12728287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma.
Krishnamurthy S; Sneige N; Bedi DG; Edieken BS; Fornage BD; Kuerer HM; Singletary SE; Hunt KK
Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(5):982-8. PubMed ID: 12209680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical lymphadenopathy: ratio of long- to short-axis diameter as a predictor of malignancy.
Steinkamp HJ; Cornehl M; Hosten N; Pegios W; Vogl T; Felix R
Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):266-70. PubMed ID: 7735765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Results of pretherapeutic lymph node diagnosis in head and neck tumors. Clinical value of 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)].
Di Martino E; Nowak B; Krombach GA; Sellhaus B; Hausmann R; Cremerius U; Büll U; Westhofen M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Apr; 79(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10838683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography scanning, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and standard axillary dissection for axillary staging in patients with early stage breast cancer.
Lovrics PJ; Chen V; Coates G; Cornacchi SD; Goldsmith CH; Law C; Levine MN; Sanders K; Tandan VR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Sep; 11(9):846-53. PubMed ID: 15313737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for characterisation and differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes.
Săftoiu A; Vilmann P; Hassan H; Gorunescu F
Ultraschall Med; 2006 Dec; 27(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 17160759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colour Doppler flow in normal axillary lymph nodes.
Yang WT; Metreweli C
Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):381-3. PubMed ID: 9659130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enlarged cervical lymph nodes at helical CT.
Steinkamp HJ; Hosten N; Richter C; Schedel H; Felix R
Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):795-8. PubMed ID: 8184067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative fine needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer: clinical utility, diagnostic accuracy and potential pitfalls.
Gilani SM; Fathallah L; Al-Khafaji BM
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 24923670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results.
Malich A; Fritsch T; Anderson R; Boehm T; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(10):1555-61. PubMed ID: 11044924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis.
Choi MY; Lee JW; Jang KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):981-4. PubMed ID: 7677005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrical impedance scanning of thyroid nodules before thyroid surgery: a prospective study.
Stojadinovic A; Fields SI; Shriver CD; Lenington S; Ginor R; Peoples GE; Burch HB; Peretz T; Freund HR; Nissan A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Feb; 12(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 15827796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the clinically positive axilla in breast cancer really a contraindication to sentinel lymph node biopsy?
Specht MC; Fey JV; Borgen PI; Cody HS
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Jan; 200(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 15631914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective trial evaluating electrical impedance scanning of thyroid nodules before thyroidectomy: final results.
Nissan A; Peoples GE; Abu-Wasel B; Adair CF; Prus D; Howard RS; Lenington SG; Fields SI; Freund HR; Peretz T; Burch HB; Shriver CD; Stojadinovic A
Ann Surg; 2008 May; 247(5):843-53. PubMed ID: 18438123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
