These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
28. The strength-duration relationship of monophasic waveforms with varying capacitance sizes in external defibrillation. Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey K; Mazgalev TN; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Dec; 26(12):2213-8. PubMed ID: 14675002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Benefit of millisecond waveform durations for patients with high defibrillation thresholds. Denman RA; Umesan C; Martin PT; Forbes RN; Kroll MW; Anskey EJ; Burnett HE Heart Rhythm; 2006 May; 3(5):536-41. PubMed ID: 16648057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms delivered from various capacitances/pulse widths. Lin JH; Stotts LJ; Rosborough JP; Frederick H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):158-62. PubMed ID: 9121981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of single-biphasic versus sequential-biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold in pigs. Csanadi Z; Jones DL; Wood GK; Klein GJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jun; 20(6):1606-12. PubMed ID: 9227756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical evaluation of defibrillation efficacy with a new single-capacitor biphasic waveform in patients undergoing implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Brugada J; Herse B; Sandsted B; Michel U; Schubert BD; Hahn SJ Europace; 2001 Oct; 3(4):278-84. PubMed ID: 11678385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A prospective randomized comparison of defibrillation efficacy of truncated pulses and damped sine wave pulses in humans. Bardy GH; Zaghi H; Gartman D; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PK; Dolack GL; Johnson G; Troutman C J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Sep; 5(9):725-30. PubMed ID: 7827711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimizing defibrillation through improved waveforms. Block M; Breithardt G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Mar; 18(3 Pt 2):526-38. PubMed ID: 7777417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode. Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system. Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of electrode polarity on internal defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic waveforms using an endocardial lead system. Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Walker RG; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9048247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]