These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11228854)
1. Cardiac output-based versus empirically programmed AV interval--how different are they? Crystal E; Ovsyshcher IE Europace; 1999 Apr; 1(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 11228854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Hemodynamic benefits of AV interval adjustment and heart rate increase during exercise in dual-chamber pacing as determined by Doppler]. Sancho-Tello MJ; Salvador A; Olagüe J Rev Esp Cardiol; 1990; 43 Suppl 2():76-83. PubMed ID: 2236802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The hemodynamic benefit of differential atrioventricular delay intervals for sensed and paced atrial events during physiologic pacing. Janosik DL; Pearson AC; Buckingham TA; Labovitz AJ; Redd RM J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Aug; 14(2):499-507. PubMed ID: 2754135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acute hemodynamic effects of different atrioventricular intervals in dual chamber pacemakers: is there an optimum atrioventricular delay. Mohan JC; Sethi KK; Pandit N; Bhargava M; Arora R; Khalilullah M Indian Heart J; 1992; 44(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 1427936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of atrioventricular delay by surface electrocardiography during dual chamber pacing. Wu LQ; Gu G; Cao M; Shen YC; Su K; Shen WF Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Mar; 119(6):454-7. PubMed ID: 16584642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal atrioventricular delay setting determined by evoked QT interval in patients with implanted stimulus-T-driven DDDR pacemakers. Ishikawa T; Sugano T; Sumita S; Nakagawa T; Hanada K; Kosuge M; Kobayashi I; Kimura K; Tochikubo O; Usui T; Umemura S Europace; 2001 Jan; 3(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 11271951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays. Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The effect of changes in stroke volume on QT dispersion during long-term DDD and VVI pacing]. Lelakowski J; Majewski J; Bednarek J; Szczepkowski J; Machejek J Przegl Lek; 2001; 58(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11475854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive measurement of atrial contribution to the cardiac output in children and adolescents with congenital complete atrioventricular block treated with dual-chamber pacemakers. Hauser J; Michel-Behnke I; Zervan K; Pees C Am J Cardiol; 2011 Jan; 107(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 21146693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impedance cardiography: a useful and reliable tool in optimization of cardiac resynchronization devices. Heinroth KM; Elster M; Nuding S; Schlegel F; Christoph A; Carter J; Buerke M; Werdan K Europace; 2007 Sep; 9(9):744-50. PubMed ID: 17496288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between atrioventricular delay, QT interval and cardiac function in patients with implanted DDD pacemakers. Ishikawa T; Sugano T; Sumita S; Kimura K; Kikuchi M; Kosuge M; Kobayashi I; Shigemasa T; Endo T; Usui T; Umemura S Europace; 1999 Jul; 1(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 11225797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimisation of atrioventricular delay during exercise improves cardiac output in patients stabilised with cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Sun JP; Lee AP; Grimm RA; Hung MJ; Yang XS; Delurgio D; Leon AR; Merlino JD; Yu CM Heart; 2012 Jan; 98(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 21880650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of the optimal atrioventricular delay in DDD pacing. Comparison between echo and peak endocardial acceleration measurements. Ritter P; Padeletti L; Gillio-Meina L; Gaggini G Europace; 1999 Apr; 1(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 11228855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impedance cardiography as a noninvasive technique for atrioventricular interval optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Braun MU; Schnabel A; Rauwolf T; Schulze M; Strasser RH J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2005 Sep; 13(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 16177849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Doppler echocardiography and double chamber pacing]. Mabo P; Varin C; De Place C; Kermarrec A; Berder V; Daubert C Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1992 May; 41(5):295-304. PubMed ID: 1416772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduction of RV pacing by continuous optimization of the AV interval. Milasinovic G; Sperzel J; Smith TW; Mead H; Brandt J; Haisty WK; Bailey JR; Roelke M; Simonson J; Gerritse B; Englund J; Compton SJ; Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Apr; 29(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 16650270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Importance of left atrial timing in the programming of dual-chamber pacemakers. Wish M; Fletcher RD; Gottdiener JS; Cohen AI Am J Cardiol; 1987 Sep; 60(7):566-71. PubMed ID: 3630938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal atrioventricular delay at rest and during exercise in patients with dual chamber pacemakers: a non-invasive assessment by continuous wave Doppler. Mehta D; Gilmour S; Ward DE; Camm AJ Br Heart J; 1989 Feb; 61(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 2923753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Noninvasive evaluation of hemodynamics in changes in the atrioventricular interval in patients with dual-chamber pacemakers]. Minarík T; Stípal R Vnitr Lek; 1992 Jan; 38(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 1561768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal sensed atrio-ventricular interval determined by paced QRS morphology. Van Gelder BM; Bracke FA; Van Der Voort PH; Meijer A Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Apr; 30(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 17437570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]