These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11228871)

  • 1. [Instruments for quantitative methods of nursing research].
    Vellone E
    Prof Inferm; 2000; 53(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 11228871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finding and evaluating potential research instruments.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 2003; 13(4):207-8. PubMed ID: 14692363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Introduction to instrument development: scaling methods.
    Summers S
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1993 Feb; 8(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 8478809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].
    Reine G; Lancon C; Simeoni MC; Duplan S; Auquier P
    Encephale; 2003; 29(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 14567165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development.
    Rattray J; Jones MC
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Feb; 16(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 17239058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Introduction to instrument development for postanesthesia studies.
    Summers S
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1992 Jun; 7(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 1534848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of instruments measuring resilience.
    Ahern NR; Kiehl EM; Sole ML; Byers J
    Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs; 2006; 29(2):103-25. PubMed ID: 16772239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Instruments used in Roy adaptation model-based research: review, critique, and future directions.
    Barone SH; Roy CL; Frederickson KC
    Nurs Sci Q; 2008 Oct; 21(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 18953014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reading research critically: assessing the validity and reliability of research instrumentation--Part 2.
    Giuffre M
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1995 Apr; 10(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7722945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-report family assessment instruments: an evaluative review [see comment].
    Halvorsen JG
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):21-55. PubMed ID: 2028813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to try this: define your terms. Evaluating instruments for use in nursing practice.
    Stotts NA; Aldrich KM
    Am J Nurs; 2007 Oct; 107(10):71-2. PubMed ID: 17895736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of an instrument measuring Chinese adolescent beliefs and attitudes towards substance abuse.
    Fok MS; Tsang WY
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Sep; 14(8):986-94. PubMed ID: 16102150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a measure to delineate the clinical trials nursing role.
    Ehrenberger HE; Lillington L
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2004 May; 31(3):E64-8. PubMed ID: 15152276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of bayesian methodology to measure equivalence between two rating scales.
    Pawlowicz FE; Gajewski BJ; Coffland V; Boyle DK; Bott MJ; Dunton N
    Nurs Res; 2012; 61(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 22551992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes: the Q-DIO.
    Müller-Staub M; Lunney M; Odenbreit M; Needham I; Lavin MA; van Achterberg T
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1027-37. PubMed ID: 19220614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of instruments measuring two aspects of meaning: search for meaning and meaning in illness.
    Fjelland JE; Barron CR; Foxall M
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 May; 62(4):394-406. PubMed ID: 18476940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective measurement of childhood sexual abuse: a review of instruments.
    Hulme PA
    Child Maltreat; 2004 May; 9(2):201-17. PubMed ID: 15104889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of the validity of inferences made from 3 diabetes assessment instruments: a Rasch analysis.
    Handley LI; Warholak Jackson TL; Jackson TR
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2008 Mar; 4(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 18342824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Further psychometric testing and use of the Maternal Confidence Questionnaire.
    Badr LK
    Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs; 2005; 28(3):163-74. PubMed ID: 16251162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Self-rating scales in schizophrenia: validity assessment of the Paranoid-Depression Scale (PD-S), the Frankfurt Self-feeling Scale (FBS) and of two visual analogy scales].
    Schaeffer E; Wciórka J
    Psychiatr Pol; 2003; 37(2):293-314. PubMed ID: 12776660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.