BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11229381)

  • 1. Evidence is not (yet) enough for evidence based policy for chlamydia screening.
    ClaSS Study Group
    BMJ; 2001 Feb; 322(7282):364-5. PubMed ID: 11229381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commentary: Chlamydia trachomatis screening: what are we trying to do?
    Peterman TA; Gottlieb SL; Berman SM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 38(2):449-51. PubMed ID: 19174542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence based health policy report. Screening for genital chlamydial infection.
    Pimenta J; Catchpole M; Gray M; Hopwood J; Randall S
    BMJ; 2000 Sep; 321(7261):629-31. PubMed ID: 10977848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening for chlamydia: seize the day.
    Randall S; LaMontagne DS
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Apr; 31(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 15921540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic men who have sex with men.
    Coughlan E; Young S
    N Z Med J; 2006 Apr; 119(1232):U1948. PubMed ID: 16633402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New report and pilot studies on Chlamydia.
    Commun Dis Rep CDR Wkly; 1998 May; 8(19):167. PubMed ID: 9635337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in college women with a polymerase chain reaction assay.
    Baxter R
    Clin Infect Dis; 2000 Feb; 30(2):406-7. PubMed ID: 10671359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the leukocyte esterase test (LET) as pre-screening test to reduce costs for national population-based Chlamydia trachomatis screening programs.
    Morré SA; Spaargaren J; Veldhuijzen IK; Postma MJ; van Bergen JE; van Bergen JE; Broer J; Coenen AJ; Götz HM; de Groot F; Hoebe CJ; Richardus JH; van Schaik DT; Veldhuijzen IK; Verhooren M;
    J Adolesc Health; 2006 Apr; 38(4):332-3; author reply 333-4. PubMed ID: 16549289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines on Screening for Chlamydia.
    Ursu A; Sen A; Ruffin M
    Ann Fam Med; 2015; 13(4):361-3. PubMed ID: 26195682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. British Chief Medical Officer recommendations for genital chlamydial infection screening may not be applicable outside the UK.
    LaMontagne DS; Catchpole M; Fenton K
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):210; reply 210-1. PubMed ID: 14738660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An audit of Chlamydia trachomatis screening in colposcopy--Hartlepool experience.
    Tayal SC; Robertson A; Doxford L
    Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Jul; 16(7):500-1. PubMed ID: 16004631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving Chlamydia trachomatis retesting rates by mailed self-collection kit.
    Buhrer-Skinner M; Muller R; Buettner PG; Gordon R; Debattista J
    Sex Health; 2011 Jun; 8(2):248-50. PubMed ID: 21592441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections--2002.
    Johnson RE; Newhall WJ; Papp JR; Knapp JS; Black CM; Gift TL; Steece R; Markowitz LE; Devine OJ; Walsh CM; Wang S; Gunter DC; Irwin KL; DeLisle S; Berman SM
    MMWR Recomm Rep; 2002 Oct; 51(RR-15):1-38; quiz CE1-4. PubMed ID: 12418541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chlamydia trachomatis in primary care: knowledge and practice in Glasgow.
    Kinn S; Macnaughton J; Noone A; Scoular A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Mar; 50(452):214-5. PubMed ID: 10750232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expanding efforts to prevent chlamydial infection.
    Stamm WE
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Sep; 339(11):768-70. PubMed ID: 9731096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic methodologies for chlamydia screening in females aged 15 to 25 years from private insurance claims data in the United States, 2001 to 2005.
    Owusu-Edusei K; Bohm MK; Kent CK
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Jul; 36(7):419-21. PubMed ID: 19556935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chlamydia screening in general practice: a missed opportunity?
    Ma R
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Jul; 31(3):254-5; author reply 255. PubMed ID: 16105308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laboratory aspects of screening men for Chlamydia trachomatis in the new millennium.
    Gaydos CA; Ferrero DV; Papp J
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S45-50. PubMed ID: 18449069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine samples. Possibility of a non-invasive screening].
    Clerici P; Pescatori T; de Bartolo A; Lusco G
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 1994 Jun; 66(3):125-8. PubMed ID: 7920742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Chlamydia trachomatis].
    Rasmussen KL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Jul; 158(27):3952. PubMed ID: 8701515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.