These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11229381)
41. Chlamydia trachomatis: time for screening? Spiliopoulou A; Lakiotis V; Vittoraki A; Zavou D; Mauri D Clin Microbiol Infect; 2005 Sep; 11(9):687-9. PubMed ID: 16104982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Chlamydia test via Internet a good alternative to testing in clinics]. Stenqvist K; Lindqvist A; Almerson P; Jonsson L; Lander R Lakartidningen; 2010 Feb 10-16; 107(6):350-3. PubMed ID: 20297585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Chlamydia screening is not cost-effective at low participation rates: evidence from a repeated register-based implementation study in The Netherlands. de Wit GA; Over EA; Schmid BV; van Bergen JE; van den Broek IV; van der Sande MA; Welte R; Op de Coul EL; Kretzschmar ME Sex Transm Infect; 2015 Sep; 91(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 25759475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Chlamydia trachomatis during pregnancy. To screen or not to screen? Carroll JC Can Fam Physician; 1993 Jan; 39():97-102. PubMed ID: 8435566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Chlamydia screening would pay dividends. Robinson A Practitioner; 1998 Oct; 242(1591):667. PubMed ID: 10343443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Screening for chlamydia trachomatis: barriers for homeless young people. Henning D; Alice R; Sanci L; Dunning T Aust J Adv Nurs; 2007; 24(3):8-13. PubMed ID: 17518159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Routine screening of asymptomatic men for Chlamydia trachomatis-negative urethritis. Watson P Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Nov; 16(11):769. PubMed ID: 16303079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Opportunistic screening for chlamydia. Banerjee I J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Jan; 31(1):81; author reply 81. PubMed ID: 15720865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparative sources of positive female chlamydia diagnoses and places of treatment of chlamydia in leicester 1997-1999 inclusive. A changing trend? Evans DT Int J STD AIDS; 2001 Jan; 12(1):62. PubMed ID: 11177486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Opportunistic evidence: evidence-based policy in the setting of the Australian Government's chlamydia screening pilot. Crouch SR Aust Health Rev; 2012 Feb; 36(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 22513021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Britain launches pilot screening programme for chlamydia. Bower H BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7143):1479. PubMed ID: 9616020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. NICE guidance and the National Chlamydia Screening Programme. Stephenson J Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Apr; 83(2):170. PubMed ID: 17435055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The National Chlamydia Screening Programme and the NICE guidance on one-to-one interventions: remember the under-25s. Simms I; Battison T; Macintosh M; Randall S; Clarke J Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Apr; 83(2):171. PubMed ID: 17435057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Commentary on 'Screening for chlamydia infection: recommendations and rationale'. Newland JA Am J Nurs; 2002 Oct; 102(10):93. PubMed ID: 12394312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]