These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11229381)

  • 41. Chlamydia trachomatis: time for screening?
    Spiliopoulou A; Lakiotis V; Vittoraki A; Zavou D; Mauri D
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2005 Sep; 11(9):687-9. PubMed ID: 16104982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Chlamydia test via Internet a good alternative to testing in clinics].
    Stenqvist K; Lindqvist A; Almerson P; Jonsson L; Lander R
    Lakartidningen; 2010 Feb 10-16; 107(6):350-3. PubMed ID: 20297585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Chlamydia screening is not cost-effective at low participation rates: evidence from a repeated register-based implementation study in The Netherlands.
    de Wit GA; Over EA; Schmid BV; van Bergen JE; van den Broek IV; van der Sande MA; Welte R; Op de Coul EL; Kretzschmar ME
    Sex Transm Infect; 2015 Sep; 91(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 25759475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Chlamydia trachomatis: common misperceptions and misunderstandings.
    Stevens-Simon C; Sheeder J
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 18(4):231-43. PubMed ID: 16171726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Screening for chlamydia--a key to the prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease.
    Hillis SD; Wasserheit JN
    N Engl J Med; 1996 May; 334(21):1399-401. PubMed ID: 8614429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Chlamydia trachomatis.
    McSherry J
    Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Apr; 45(393):219-20. PubMed ID: 7612331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Chlamydia trachomatis during pregnancy. To screen or not to screen?
    Carroll JC
    Can Fam Physician; 1993 Jan; 39():97-102. PubMed ID: 8435566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Chlamydia screening would pay dividends.
    Robinson A
    Practitioner; 1998 Oct; 242(1591):667. PubMed ID: 10343443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Screening for chlamydia trachomatis: barriers for homeless young people.
    Henning D; Alice R; Sanci L; Dunning T
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2007; 24(3):8-13. PubMed ID: 17518159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Routine screening of asymptomatic men for Chlamydia trachomatis-negative urethritis.
    Watson P
    Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Nov; 16(11):769. PubMed ID: 16303079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Opportunistic screening for chlamydia.
    Banerjee I
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Jan; 31(1):81; author reply 81. PubMed ID: 15720865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Upsurge of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Weir E
    CMAJ; 2004 Oct; 171(8):855. PubMed ID: 15477622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sports preparticipation examination to screen college athletes for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Hennrikus E; Oberto D; Linder JM; Rempel JM; Hennrikus N
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Apr; 42(4):683-8. PubMed ID: 21099757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Commentary: evidence synthesis and evidence consistency.
    Ades AE
    Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 33(2):426-7. PubMed ID: 15082652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparative sources of positive female chlamydia diagnoses and places of treatment of chlamydia in leicester 1997-1999 inclusive. A changing trend?
    Evans DT
    Int J STD AIDS; 2001 Jan; 12(1):62. PubMed ID: 11177486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Opportunistic evidence: evidence-based policy in the setting of the Australian Government's chlamydia screening pilot.
    Crouch SR
    Aust Health Rev; 2012 Feb; 36(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 22513021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Britain launches pilot screening programme for chlamydia.
    Bower H
    BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7143):1479. PubMed ID: 9616020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. NICE guidance and the National Chlamydia Screening Programme.
    Stephenson J
    Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Apr; 83(2):170. PubMed ID: 17435055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The National Chlamydia Screening Programme and the NICE guidance on one-to-one interventions: remember the under-25s.
    Simms I; Battison T; Macintosh M; Randall S; Clarke J
    Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Apr; 83(2):171. PubMed ID: 17435057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Commentary on 'Screening for chlamydia infection: recommendations and rationale'.
    Newland JA
    Am J Nurs; 2002 Oct; 102(10):93. PubMed ID: 12394312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.