154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11230640)
1. Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.
Floyd CE; Warp RJ; Dobbins JT; Chotas HG; Baydush AH; Vargas-Voracek R; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 11230640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
Chotas HG; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system.
Spahn M; Strotzer M; Völk M; Böhm S; Geiger B; Hahm G; Feuerbach S
Invest Radiol; 2000 Apr; 35(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 10764095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images.
Peer S; Neitzel U; Giacomuzzi SM; Peer R; Gassner E; Steingruber I; Jaschke W
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Mar; 20(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 11341713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector.
Neitzel U; Maack I; Günther-Kohfahl S
Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 8058016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications.
Granfors PR; Aufrichtig R
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1324-31. PubMed ID: 10902562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems].
Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Stadler A
Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A detector for scanned projection radiography.
Sones RA; Lauro KL; Cattell CL
Radiology; 1990 May; 175(2):553-9. PubMed ID: 2326481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems--a contrast-detail phantom study.
Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Liu X; Lemacks MR; Thompson SK
Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2328-35. PubMed ID: 11764040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
Busch HP
Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector.
Hosch WP; Fink C; Radeleff B; kampschulte a A; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
Clin Radiol; 2002 Oct; 57(10):902-7. PubMed ID: 12413914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization and potential applications of a dual-layer flat-panel detector.
Shi L; Lu M; Bennett NR; Shapiro E; Zhang J; Colbeth R; Star-Lack J; Wang AS
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3332-3343. PubMed ID: 32347561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chest radiography with a large-area detector based on cesium-iodide/amorphous-silicon technology: image quality and dose requirement in comparison with an asymmetric screen-film system.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Reiser M; Lenhart M; Manke C; Gmeinwieser J; Holzknecht N; Link J; Feuerbach S
J Thorac Imaging; 2000 Jul; 15(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 10928606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen.
Okamura T; Tanaka S; Koyama K; Norihumi N; Daikokuya H; Matsuoka T; Kishimoto K; Hatagawa M; Kudoh H; Yamada R
Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1741-7. PubMed ID: 12111065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
