These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11231152)

  • 1. The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp.
    Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Curr Biol; 2001 Feb; 11(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11231152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual illusions modify object size estimates for prospective action judgements.
    Geers L; Pesenti M; Andres M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():211-221. PubMed ID: 29883576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The functional subdivision of the visual brain: Is there a real illusion effect on action? A multi-lab replication study.
    Kopiske KK; Bruno N; Hesse C; Schenk T; Franz VH
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():130-52. PubMed ID: 27156056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.
    Franz VH; Bülthoff HH; Fahle M
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Apr; 149(4):470-7. PubMed ID: 12677327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: one- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment.
    Vishton PM; Fabre E
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):377-92. PubMed ID: 12858958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?
    Pavani F; Boscagli I; Benvenuti F; Rabuffetti M; Farnè A
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Jul; 127(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 10424418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.
    Haffenden AM; Goodale MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jan; 10(1):122-36. PubMed ID: 9526087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.
    Gilster R; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Wiesner CD; Ferstl R
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 16710685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attenuation of size illusion effect in dual-task conditions.
    Katsumata H
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Oct; 67():102497. PubMed ID: 31326743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How preparation to touch or grasp alters visual size perception.
    Vishton PM; Jones ED; Stevens JA
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():431-5. PubMed ID: 26245648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action.
    Haffenden AM; Goodale MA
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(10-12):1597-607. PubMed ID: 10788660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The combination of target motion and dynamic changes in context greatly enhance visual size illusions.
    Mruczek REB; Fanelli M; Kelly S; Caplovitz GP
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():959367. PubMed ID: 36188172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying the Ebbinghaus figure effect: target size, context size, and target-context distance determine the presence and direction of the illusion.
    Knol H; Huys R; Sarrazin JC; Jirsa VK
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1679. PubMed ID: 26583002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frames of reference for perception and action in the human visual system.
    Goodale MA; Haffenden A
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 1998 Mar; 22(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 9579308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual spatial illusions: a general explanation.
    Day RH
    Science; 1972 Mar; 175(4028):1335-40. PubMed ID: 5059563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children.
    Hanisch C; Konczak J; Dohle C
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 137(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 11315553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does a monocularly presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture?
    Marotta JJ; DeSouza JF; Haffenden AM; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Jun; 36(6):491-7. PubMed ID: 9705058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Looking at the Ebbinghaus illusion: differences in neurocomputational requirements, not gaze-mediated attention, explain a classic perception-action dissociation.
    Whitwell RL; Garach MA; Goodale MA; Sperandio I
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1869):20210459. PubMed ID: 36511402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.
    Aglioti S; DeSouza JF; Goodale MA
    Curr Biol; 1995 Jun; 5(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 7552179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.